RHYTHMANALYSIS AS A EFFECTIVE TOOL OF ADAPTIVE URBANISM

Authors

  • K. Chechelnytska O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-3-191-161-165

Keywords:

rhythmanalysis, adaptive urbanism, city planning, spatial development, urban environment

Abstract

This article examines rhythmanalysis as a critical tool within the framework of adaptive urbanism, focusing on its capacity to analyze and interpret the temporal rhythms inherent in urban life. Rhythmanalysis, originally conceptualized by Henri Lefebvre, involves the study of recurring patterns and cycles (daily, weekly, seasonal, and event-based) that shape the dynamics of urban spaces. Understanding these rhythms allows urban planners and designers to develop more responsive and flexible spatial strategies that accommodate the fluid and ever-changing nature of contemporary cities.
Adaptive urbanism, as an emerging approach to city planning, emphasizes resilience, flexibility, and the capacity of urban environments to respond effectively to social, cultural, economic, and environmental changes. By integrating rhythmanalysis, adaptive urbanism gains a methodological framework to decode the temporal and socio-cultural complexities of urban life. This enables the creation of urban spaces that are not only functional and efficient but also socially inclusive and sensitive to the diverse temporalities of city dwellers.
The article discusses various methods of rhythmanalysis, including observational studies, mapping of activity patterns, and the use of digital tools to capture temporal data. It highlights case studies where rhythmanalysis has been applied successfully to inform adaptive design interventions, enhancing urban livability and sustainability. The temporal dimension of urban processes (such as commuting flows, recreational activities, business hours, and cultural events) is critically analyzed to reveal how these overlapping rhythms influence spatial use and urban form.
Furthermore, the research underscores the importance of considering socio-cultural rhythms, including rituals, festivals, and community practices, which contribute significantly to the identity and cohesion of urban neighborhoods. By incorporating these temporal layers into urban planning, cities can foster environments that better reflect the lived experiences of their inhabitants.
In conclusion, the article advocates for the broader adoption of rhythmanalysis within adaptive urbanism as a means to create cities that are resilient, dynamic, and attuned to the complex temporalities of urban life. This approach not only improves spatial planning processes but also promotes more equitable and sustainable urban futures.

References

Lefebvre, H. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. – London: Continuum, 2004. – 160 p.

Edensor, T. Geographies of Rhythm: Nature, Place, Mobilities and Bodies. – Farnham: Ashgate, 2010. – 256 p.

Wunderlich, F. M. Place-Temporality and Urban Place-Rhythms in Urban Analysis and Design: An Aesthetic Akin to Music / F. M. Wunderlich // Journal of Urban Design. – 2013. – Vol. 18(3). – P. 383–408.

Middleton, J. The 'Sense of the City': Atmospheres, Practices and the Production of the Urban / J. Middleton // Geography Compass. – 2011. – Vol. 5(11). – P. 731–740.

Gehl, J. Cities for People. – Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010. – 288 p.

Древаль І. В. Актуальні напрямки наукових досліджень та практичний досвід формування комунікаційної інфраструктури сучасного міста // Містобудування та територіальне планування. – 2023. – № 83. – С. 62–71. – https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2023.83.62-71.

Тімохін В. О. Тенденції та перспективи архітектонічних перетворень міського середовища й урбанізованого оточення // Досвід та перспективи розвитку міст України. Ландшафтне планування. – 2020. – № 24.

Чечельницька К. С. Урбосоціологія як синтез наук про міста і суспільство / В кн.: Резван О. О. (ред.) Соціально-психологічний супровід у мегаполісі: колективна монографія. м Харків : Видавництво Іванченка І. С., 2024. – С. 7–26.

Till, J. Architecture Depends. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009. – 256 p.

Franck, K. A., Stevens, Q. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. – London: Routledge, 2006. – 320 p.

Mondrian P. Піт Мондріан [Електронний ресурс] / WikiArt. – Режим доступу: https://www.wikiart.org/uk/pit-mondrian, вільний. – Дата звернення: 26.05.2025.

Чечельницька К. С. Теоретичні засади становлення урбаністики // Науковий вісник будівництва. – 2024. – № 111. – С. 55–60.

Chechelnytska K., Kravchenko S., Vinnychenko T. Psychogeography as a reflection of cognitive urbanism // AIP Conference Proceedings. – 2023. – Vol. 2490, No. 1. – December. – https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0178394.

Published

2025-06-13

How to Cite

RHYTHMANALYSIS AS A EFFECTIVE TOOL OF ADAPTIVE URBANISM. (2025). Municipal Economy of Cities, 3(191), 161-165. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-3-191-161-165