THE PALACE OF LABOUR IN KHARKIV: ARCHITECTURAL TRANSFORMATIONS AND APPROACHES TO POST-WAR RECONSTRUCTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-3-191-189-197Keywords:
Palace of Labour, Kharkiv architecture, heritage restoration, war damage, urban identity, adaptive reuse, stylistic transformation, historical continuityAbstract
The article addresses the challenges and prospects of preserving architectural heritage in wartime conditions by examining the case of the Palace of Labour in Kharkiv, a significant urban and architectural landmark severely damaged during the 2022 military aggression. The building, situated in the historic Constitution Square, has served multiple functions throughout its existence—from income-generating residential housing to a commercial and administrative center—embodying the ideological and functional shifts in the city’s evolution from the pre-revolutionary period to Soviet industrialization and into the contemporary era of Ukrainian urban development.
Through the identification and analysis of the building's major transformation stages, the study explores how stylistic features—ranging from Art Nouveau to Neoclassicism and early Constructivism—are integrated into its volume-spatial structure. These characteristics are considered not only in terms of architectural aesthetics but also as reflections of sociocultural and urban dynamics. The Palace of Labour is examined as a key architectural dominant within the spatial composition of central Kharkiv, influencing both the visual identity and functional logic of the urban environment.
The research emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in heritage conservation that takes into account urban planning context, architectural value, structural condition, and socio-economic potential. The article outlines both general and specific factors that justify the building’s restoration, including the preservation of historical urban continuity, the potential for adaptive reuse, and the enhancement of civic identity through sustained heritage. Recommendations for future functional repurposing are also presented, including the revitalization of interior commercial spaces and the potential introduction of new public amenities.
This publication forms the first part of a comprehensive research project. The subsequent article will focus on a more detailed architectural and stylistic analysis, with particular attention to the planning composition, volume articulation, and decorative solutions of the Palace of Labour, aiming to inform the development of a restoration strategy that ensures both historical accuracy and modern functionality.
References
Денисенко О. Неокласицизм як стилістична течія в архітектурі харкова першого десятиріччя ХХ ст. Художнє життя Харкова першої третини ХХ століття: тези доповідей та повідомлень. Харків, 1993. С. 4–6.
Чечельницька О. С. Принципи сучасної реконструкції та модернізації кварталів, забудованих прибутковими будинками. Сучасні проблеми архітектури та містобудування. 2010. С. 158–160.
Малаков Д. Прибуткові будинки Києва. Київ, 2009.
Тимофієнко В. І. Історія української архітектури. Київ : Техніка, 2003.
Гутник М. В. Харків. Втрата архітектурної спадщини міста. Актуальні питання у сучасній науці. 2024. С. 855–863.
Гусєв О. М. Guide historico-indicateur de la ville de Kharkoff, intitulé Kharkoff, autrefois et aujourd’hui. Харків : Видавництво А. Дарре, 1902. 256 p.
Сносъ арки. Южный край. 1914. 24 трав.
Новое грандіозное зданіе. Южний край. 1912. 24 трав.
Домъ о-ва «Россія». Харьковскія вђдомости. 1914. 4 черв.
Домъ страхового о-ва «Россія». Утро. 1914. 23 лют.
Шевельов Ю. Третій Харків. Львів : Урбіно, 2025.
Дяченко М. Т., Розін С. О., Рябко В. І. Харків. Місця історичних подій, пам’ятники і заклади культури, видатні діячі / ред. А. Д. Скаба. Харків : Харків. обласне вид-во, 1957.
Новый домъ страхового Общества «Россія». Южный край. 1914. 18 січ.
Історія міста Харкова ХХ століття. Фоліо. Золоті сторінки. Харків, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
