DEVELOPMENT OF A TOOL FOR ASSESSING THE PERCEPTION OF ARCHITECTURAL ENVIRONMENT IN VIRTUAL REALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-3-191-155-160Keywords:
virtual reality, architectural environment, questionnaire, emotions, perception, space, communication, userAbstract
The article presents the development and pilot validation of a diagnostic questionnaire designed to assess the cognitive and emotional responses of users interacting with virtual representations of architectural environments. The increasing application of immersive technologies in architectural design, particularly virtual reality, has opened new possibilities for visualizing and experiencing space long before it is physically constructed. However, the lack of standardized tools for measuring users’ subjective reactions to such environments limits the effectiveness of virtual design communication and user-centered design decision-making.
The main objective of this research was to create a structured, reliable instrument that enables the evaluation of how users perceive, interpret, and emotionally respond to architectural spaces in virtual reality. The proposed questionnaire consists of 12 statements grouped into four thematic blocks: cognitive perception of space, emotional response, sense of presence and immersion, and communicative effectiveness of the VR presentation. Each item is rated using a five-point Likert scale, from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree”.
A pilot test was conducted with 30 participants of various roles and levels of VR experience. The results demonstrated high internal consistency of the scale: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the four blocks ranged from 0.81 to 0.88, indicating strong reliability. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the structural validity of the instrument, with the identified factors aligning with the theoretically proposed dimensions. These findings support the use of the questionnaire in both academic research and professional architectural practice.
The tool not only captures the clarity and logical structure of spatial solutions but also provides insights into users’ emotional engagement and ability to comprehend and communicate architectural ideas. The integration of such an instrument into the design process may significantly improve user feedback mechanisms, promote participatory practices, and enhance the communicative bridge between architects, clients, and end users within virtual environments.
References
Shataliuk, D. (2025). Virtual reality as a communicative bridge between the client, architect, and community. Urban development and spatial planning: Scien.-tech. journal, 88, 227–238. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2025.88.227-238
Shataliuk, Y. V., Demydiuk, O. B., & Shataliuk, D. A. (2023). Features of the architectural environment influence on the psycho-emotional state of a person. In Promising areas of theoretical and applied research 2023 (Sworld-US Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1, usc21-01, pp. 42–47). Seattle, USA. https://doi.org/10.30888/2709-2267.2023-21-01-013
Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J.J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 557–564.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200735
Hornsey, R. L., & Hibbard, P. B. (2024). Current perceptions of virtual reality technology: Applied Sciences, 14(10), 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14104222
Ruth, D. (2001) Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. PhD thesis, University College London. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1111/
Hermund, A., Klint, L., & Bundgård, T. S. (2018). The perception of architectural space in reality, in virtual reality, and through plan and section drawings: a case study of the perception of architectural atmosphere. In Proceedings of the eCAADe Conference, 36, 735-744. Retrieved from
Oladeji, F. (2022). Designing the user experience of architecture with virtual reality. Master’s thesis, College of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/125379
Paes, D., Irizarry, J., & Pujoni, D. (2021). An evidence of cognitive benefits from immersive design review: Comparing three-dimensional perception and presence between immersive and non-immersive virtual environments. Automation in Construction, 130, 103849.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103849
Shataliuk, D. (2025). Communicative toolkit of virtual reality in modern design practice and its impact on participatory practices. Scientific problems of architecture and urban planning, (3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.31650/2786-7749-2025-3-135-147
Degenhard, A., Askari, A., Rietzler, M., & Rukzio, E. (2025). When do we feel present in a virtual reality? Towards Sensitivity and User Acceptance of Presence Questionnaires. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1151, pp. 1 – 29.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714204
Naz, A., Kopper, R., McMahan, R. P., & Nadin, M. (2017). Emotional qualities of VR space. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (VR). Los Angeles, CA, USA, pp. 3-11, https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892225
Gomes, E., Rebelo, F., Boas, N., & Noriega, P. (2022). Architecture, virtual reality, and user experience. In book: Virtual and Augmented Reality for Architecture and Design, pp.138-154. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003051381-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
