PECULIARITIES OF INFLUENCE OF INTANGIBLE FACTORS ON ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL CHANGE OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES

  • M. Kosmii King Daniel University
Keywords: intangible factors, spatial structure, urban system, city, united territorial communities, change of settlements.

Abstract

At the present stage of development of territorial communities, the problem of their unification, including the change of administrative boundaries, has become a serious problem. The policy of dividing these boundaries is reflected in the perspective plan for the development of territorial communities, in particular relying on the material component without taking into account the intangible factor. This is quite clearly seen at the stage of formation of new ATGs and those conflict situations that arise in their formation.

Administrative-territorial changes, although a manifestation of legal regulation, are a combination of material and intangible factors in the development of spatial systems. The material component manifests itself in the clear regulation of the boundaries, principles and methods of organization of united communities, as well as their powers in the urban sphere. Intangible (dominant) is manifested in the fact that members of the community have the right to determine the vector and specificity of development of the spatial structure of the city or settlement. The analysis of the law on decentralization shows that the lawmakers also put the intangible in its basis: the continuity of the territory of the ОTG; taking into account historical, natural, ethnic, cultural and other factors; the impossibility of reducing the quality and publicity of all services provided before the creation of the community

The peculiarity of the transformation of the administrative-territorial structure and the process of forming the ОTG is that the center, as a rule, becomes the most developed settlement, including the city. Lastly, in this regard, it has high prospects for the development of an urbanized area, but this is possible only after overcoming a number of contradictions. It is possible to solve the latter by taking into account intangible factors, in particular property relations, which in the process of joining the city of the surrounding territories, offset the established principles of ownership and people's view of the surrounding space. Our surveys and their results prove that the agglomeration territory and the process of its formation are a consequence of socio-political processes, and the elements of the natural environment, form a new type of urban space, when the newly annexed territories are considered as recreation areas and satisfy the aesthetic and landscape preferences of residents. The latter are an intangible manifestation and, at the same time, a modern trend in the development of urbanized areas, where landscape and environmental issues are recognized as key needs of residents. In accordance with these needs, a transport network is formed and urban space is zoned. A new type of socio-economic, labor, cultural, and recreational ties is emerging.

Author Biography

M. Kosmii, King Daniel University

Ph.D., Associate Professor

References

Navishcho detsentralizatsiia? Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini. Retrieved from https://decentralization.gov.ua/about.

Pro dobrovilne obiednannia terytorialnykh hromad : Zakon Ukrainy vid 05 liut. 2015 № 157-VIII. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/157-19.

Bilshyi, nizh Barselona ta Milan: yakym bude Ivano-Frankivsk pislia stvorennia OTH (KARTA) / Halka. Ahentsiia novyn. Retrieved from https://galka.if.ua/bilshiy-nizh-barselona-ta-milan-yakim-bu/

Odyn u poli ne voin, abo Perspektyvy Lvivskoi OTH / Dyvys. Info. Retrieved from https://dyvys.info/2019/09/23/odyn-u-poli-ne-voyin-abo-perspektyvy-lvivskoyi-otg/

Chernivtsi ne khochut pryiednannia sumizhnykh sil / Holos Ukrainy. Retrieved from http://www.golos.com.ua/article/326992.

Kaluska miska obiednana terytorialna hromada / Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini. Retrieved from https://decentralization.gov.ua/gromada/1060.

Kolomyiska miska obiednana terytorialna hromada / Detsentralizatsiia v Ukraini. Retrieved from https://decentralization.gov.ua/gromada/1061.

Semenov, V.T., Zavalnыi, A.V., Apatenko, T.N., Pankeeva, A.N., Bychenko, L.A. (2014). Ahlomeratsyia – pryorytetnыe napravlenyia sovershenstvovanyia terrytoryalno-prostranstvennoho y admynystratyvnoho reformyrovanyia Ukraynы. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, 36. 344-351.

Habrel, M.M. (2004) Prostorova orhanizatsiia mistobudivnykh system. NAN Ukrainy, Instytut rehionalnykh doslidzhen. K.: Vydavnychyi dim A.S.S., 400.

Fomyn, Y. A. (1967). Kolychestvennыe pryznaky horodskykh ahlomeratsyi. Hradostroytelstvo. Raionnaia planyrovka. Horodskye ahlomeratsyy. K.: Budyvэlnыk, 20–28.

Bourassa, S. C. (1991) The Aesthetics of Landscape. London and NY : Belhaven Press, 156.

Wöbse, H. H. (2002). Landschaftsaesthetik: Über das Wesen, die Bedeutung und den Umgang mit landschaftlicher Schönheit. Wöbse H. H. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer Verlag, 304.

Habrel, M.M., Khromiak, Y.Ya., Lysiak, N.M. (2007). Osnovni vymohy do proektu «Tymchasovoho polozhennia pro Lvivsku ahlomeratsiiu». Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Menedzhment ta pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini: etapy stanovlennia i problemy rozvytku: zb.nauk.prats. Lviv: NU «Lvivska politekhnika», 605, 66–70.

Pankeeva, A.N. Kryteryy vыdelenyia terrytoryy kak ahlomeratsyy. Mezhdunarodnыi nauchno-yssledovatelskyi zhurnal : Vыpusk, 10. (76). Chast 2, 14-16.

HROMADY U ADMINISTRATYVNO-TERYTORIALNOMU USTROI UKRAINY: VAZhKYI ShLIaKh DO LEHITYMIZATsII / Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://yvu.com.ua/gromady-u-administratyvno-terytorialnomu-ustroyi-ukrayiny-vazhkyj-shlyah-do-legitymizatsiyi/

Published
2020-04-03
How to Cite
KosmiiM. (2020). PECULIARITIES OF INFLUENCE OF INTANGIBLE FACTORS ON ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL CHANGE OF TERRITORIAL COMMUNITIES. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1(154), 204-210. Retrieved from https://khg.kname.edu.ua/index.php/khg/article/view/5555