EINGORN’S AND SHELEIKHOVSKY’S SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION AND FORMATION METHODOLOGY OF «DIPROMISTO» INSTITUTE

Array

Authors

  • K. Didenko Kharkov National University of Construction and Architecture

Keywords:

Dipromisto Institute, school of urban planning, Soviet urban planning, urban planning of the Ukrainian SSR, Kharkiv metropolitan period.

Abstract

The article describes the origin and formation of the «Dipromisto» Institute. The peculiarities of the project approach and methodological findings of the institute at the beginning of 1930s are considered.. The realism and pragmatism of Ukrainian specialists in the field of urban planning are noted. A necessary component in the development of the master plan of the new city, or the reconstruction of the existing one, was the technical and economic studying of the city and more detailed analytical work. Only after that the sketch project was made and development of the final project of planning and drawing up in detail of the partial project of planning of the first turn was carried out. The Institute's development has consistently attempted to make the city aware and practical, not only as a supplement to industrial production, but as a self-sufficient facility designed to ensure all aspects of people's lives. The same approach was used in the process of developing the master plan of Kharkov (1933-1938).Thanks to the Institute, several dozen master plans of cities and about a hundred master plans of industrial settlements of the Ukrainian SSR were designed, and a master plan of Kharkov was developed.The school of complex urban planning was formed thanks to the work of many talented specialists: O. Eingorn, G. Sheleikhovsky and P. Alyoshin, as well as D. Bogorad, M. Davidovich, I. Malozyomov, O. Marzeev, P. Khaustov and other specialists.Eingorn was the undisputed ideological leader of the Institute. Thanks to his leadership, a methodology for designing cities was developed. First of all, the design process was divided into four stages: technical and economic studying of the city; drawing up a draft planning plan; development of the final planning project; drawing up a detailed partial draft of the first stage planning. Eingorn paid great attention to the architecture of the city and work with the landscape and another important implementation of O. Eingorn is a reorganization of the design process and the work of the architect-designer and associates.Another prominent specialist – G. Sheleikhovsky. He co-authored and engineered and designed two large urban projects, the master plan of Kharkiv and Big Zaporizhia. He was also a scientist who laid the foundations of urban climatology, which in the 1930s was just beginning to develop.

Author Biography

K. Didenko, Kharkov National University of Construction and Architecture

PhD in Architecture, assistant of the Department of basics of architecture

References

1. Alyoshin VE (1985) Development of the concept of a socialist settlement in the urban planning of Ukraine in the 1920s - early. 1930s (PhD Thesis), Kiev.
2. Govorenkova T. M. (1996) Self-government in Ukraine. Mediapolis 1–2, 24-29.
3. Didenko K.V. (2019) Social housing programs in the architecture of metropolian Kharkiv (1917-1934). Candi-dates dis. Kharkiv, 236.
4. Kazus IA (2001) Organization of architectural and urban planning design in the USSR: stages, problems, contradic-tions (1917-1933) (PhD Thesis) Moskow.
5. Kosenkova Yu. L. (2018) Formation of city design methodology: the experience of Kharkov Giprograd. Soviet urban planning. 1917-1941. Moskow.: Progress-Tradition, 966-1003.
6. Nikolenko T.(1989) Alexander Lvovich Eingorn. Archi-tecture of the USSR. No. 6, 98-103.
7. Novikov V. I. (1934) Experience of the Ukrainian SSR Giprograd. For the socialist reconstruction of cities (SOREGOR). No. 6, 29-31.
8. Leibfreid A. Yu., Polyakova Yu. Yu. Kharkov (2001) From Fortress to Capital: Notes on the Old City. Kharkov: Folio.
9. Khoroyan NP Kharkiv Architectural School in the Peri-od of Formation and Formation: the end of the XIX - the first third of the XX century. : Candidates dis. Kharkiv, 2015.
10. TSDAMLM. F.8. Op.1. D.759. pp. 12-23.
11. TsDNTAU. F.47, complex 2, op. 1, storage unit 99. pp. 8-38
12. Cherkasova KT (2010) Ideas and implementation of the plan of socialist reconstruction of Kharkiv 1933-1935 rokiv. Radyanske Mistobuduvannya 1920-1930-ies. Latest news and materials. Moscow: Book dim Librokom, 129 - 155.
13. Sheleikhovsky, Benevich, Hoffman. (1932). Technical and economic foundations of urban planning, T.1-3. Khar-kov: ed. Giprongrad,
14. Sheleikhovsky G. (1949) Smoke in cities. Academic communal economy named after K. Pamfilov, Moskow-Leningrad: Ed. Min. Commune economy of the RSFSR.
15. Sheleikhovsky G. (1948) Microclimate of southern cities. Moscow: Publishing house of the Academy of Sci-ences of the USSR.
16. Eingorn A. (1937) Methods of microzoning the territory of the city. Design of socialist cities. Issue 5-7. Kharkov-Kiev: Girograd, 34-36.
17. Eingorn A. Experience of urban planning in Ukrain. Problems of architecture: Sat. materials. T.2. Book 1. Mos-cow: Publishing house. VAA, 182-200.

Published

2020-09-30

How to Cite

Didenko, K. (2020). EINGORN’S AND SHELEIKHOVSKY’S SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION IN THE CREATION AND FORMATION METHODOLOGY OF «DIPROMISTO» INSTITUTE: Array. Municipal Economy of Cities, 4(157), 66–71. Retrieved from https://khg.kname.edu.ua/index.php/khg/article/view/5635