REGARDING THE USE OF MODERN TECHNICAL MEANS OF PROTECTION AGAINST FLOOD OF TERRITORIES AND FACILITIES FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES

Array

Authors

  • V. Prisyajnyuk Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection
  • S. Semychayevsky Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection
  • M. Yakimenko Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection
  • M. Osadchuk Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

Keywords:

floods, samples, technical characteristics, test methods, water-absorbing means.

Abstract

The danger to society caused by the consequences of natural disasters tends to increase despite the general technical progress and the application of measures to prevent them and combat them. Every year the number of victims, in particular, from floods increases by an average of 6%. Flooding in certain areas can occur due to floods and inundations. Floods are natural processes that occur in the biosphere and affect the planet for millennia. Flood is a significant flooding of the area due to rising water levels in rivers, lakes, reservoirs, caused by downpours, spring snowmelt, wind surges, destruction of dams, dams and more. Floods cause great material damage and casualties.

The water level in reservoirs depends on many different factors. All over the world, experts conduct long-term observations, tracking all seasonal changes, and collect data for forecasting. Floods and their causes are well studied. The main causes of these disasters are:

- prolonged rains;

- melting snow;

- raising the bottom;

- strong winds and storms;

- groundwater;

Thus, the issue of using modern technical means of protection against flooding of territories and objects of various purposes is relevant.

A number of publications consider current trends in effective flood risk management planning in the European Union and describe the catastrophic consequences of floods and ways to combat them, and so on. At the same time, these studies do not contain data on testing and implementation in Ukraine of modern technical means to combat floods in the EU.

To address these issues, the Institute of Public Administration and Research on Civil Defense commissioned by the State Service of Ukraine for Emergencies has developed a method of testing water-absorbing devices designed for:

- flood protection;

- changes in the direction of water flow during floods, torrential rains, melting snow, etc.

- removal of water from flooded areas (basements, garages, etc.);

- elimination of environmental accidents (spills of oil, diesel fuel and other chemicals).

Developed by the Institute of Public Administration and Research on Civil Protection, the method of testing water-absorbing means will allow in the future to test and assess the suitability of such technical means for use by fire and rescue units when performing tasks to remove water from flooded areas and create barriers to water. time of protection against floods, changes in the direction of water flow during floods, torrential rains, melting snow, etc.

Author Biographies

V. Prisyajnyuk, Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

Head of the Department

S. Semychayevsky, Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

Senior Researcher

M. Yakimenko, Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

Researcher

M. Osadchuk, Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

Researcher

References

1. Babadzhanova, O.F. Succinct systems of prediction and forecasting of powers / O.Ye. Pavlyuk, Yu.G. Sukach // Bulletin of Lviv State University of Safety of Life. – 2013. – No. 7. – P. 167–171.
2. Isaeva L.K. Fundamentals of ecological safety in natural disasters / L.K. Isaeva. - M .: Academy of State Fire Service of the Ministry of Emergencies of Russia, 2003. – 158 p.
3. Grigoriev A.A. Natural and anthropogenic ecological disasters. Classification and basic characteristics / A.A. Grigoriev, K.Ya. Kondratyev // Exploration of the Earth from Space, 2000. – № 2. – P. 72–83.
4. Adamenko O.M. About the possibility of transferring catastrophic floods on the rivers of the Carpathian region / О.М. Adamenko, A.I. Krizhanivsky // Materials of international sciences. – Pract. conf. "Influencing ruinous winds, floods, not safe geological processes on the function of engineering lines and safety of living". – M. Yaremche, 2009 p. – SPC “Ecology. The science. Technics ”. – P. 18–20.
5. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Volume 1: Current State and Trends: Regulation of Natural Hazards / Manoel Cardoso, Johan Goldammer, George Hurtt, Luis Jose Mata / In: Encyclopedia of Earth, Washington, 2009.
6. Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes. Transboundary Flood Risk Management: Experience from the UNECE Region. – New York and Geneva, 2009.
7. Dyson, M., G. Bergkamp, and J. Scanlon, eds, 2003: Flow: The Essentials of Environmental Flows. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K., International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
8. Francis, J., 2002: Understanding Gender and Floods in the Context of IWRM. Delft, the Netherlands, Gender and Water Alliance.
9. Global Water Partnership, 1998: Water as a Social and Economic Good: How to Put the Principle into Practice. (P. Rogers, R. Bhatia and A. Huber). Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Background Paper No. 2, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership/International Development Cooperation Agency.
10. Global Water Partnership, 1999: The Dublin Principles for Water as Reflected in a Comparative Assessment of Institutional and Legal Arrangements for Integrated Water Resources Management (M. Solanes and F. GonzalezVillarreal). Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Background Paper No. 3, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership/ International Development Cooperation Agency.
11. Global Water Partnership, 2009: Water Management, Water Security and Climate Change Adaptation: Early Impacts and Essential Responses (C. Sadoff and M. Muller). Technical Committee (TEC) Background Paper No.14, Stockholm, Global Water Partnership.
12. Green, C.H., 1999: The economics of floodplain use. Himganga, 1(3): 4–5.
13. 2000: The social relations of water. Paper presented at the international seminar, Water, town and country planning, and sustainable development, Paris, World Commission on Dams.
14. Green, C.H., Parker, D.J. and Penning-Rowsell, E.C., 1993: Designing for failure. In Natural Disasters: Protecting Vulnerable Communities (P.A. Merriman and C.W.A. Browitt, eds). London, Thomas Telford.
15. Green, C.H., D.J. Parker, and S.M. Tunstall, 2000: Assessment of Flood Control and Management Options. Cape Town, World Commission on Dams.
16. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine, 2001: Action Plan on Flood Defence. (http://www.iksr.org/index.php?id=123&L=3).
17. Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator (UNDRO), 1984: Disaster Prevention and Mitigation: A Compendium of Current Knowledge. Vol. 11, Preparedness Aspects, New York, United Nations.

Published

2021-03-26

How to Cite

Prisyajnyuk, V., Semychayevsky, S., Yakimenko, M., & Osadchuk, M. (2021). REGARDING THE USE OF MODERN TECHNICAL MEANS OF PROTECTION AGAINST FLOOD OF TERRITORIES AND FACILITIES FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES: Array. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1(161), 315–319. Retrieved from https://khg.kname.edu.ua/index.php/khg/article/view/5753

Most read articles by the same author(s)