MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF UNDERWATER DEMINING BY DIPPER DIVERS OF THE SESU
Array
Keywords:
underwater demining, emergency, diver-sapper, multifactor model.Abstract
It is shown that the problem of improving the effectiveness of prevention of emergencies related to the underwater location of explosive objects is relevant. An important and unresolved part of the problem is the lack of a mathematical model of the emergency response process associated with the underwater location of an explosive device in general. Based on this, the object of the study was the elimination of an emergency situation related to the underwater location of explosive objects, and the subject of the study – the process of operational activities of personnel of the underwater demining department of a group of special diving rescue team. The aim of the work is to develop a mathematical model of the emergency response process related to the underwater location of an explosive object as a process of functioning of the system "emergency – special means of underwater demining – diver-sapper", which should be the basis for substantiation of operational and technical recommendations. increasing the efficiency of underwater demining by diver sappers without reducing their level of safety.
It is shown that the mathematical model of underwater demining by a diver-sapper is a system of three analytical dependences. The first is a functional that describes the process of underwater demining in the form of a three-factor polynomial model. The second allows us to present this functionality as a set of one-factor models. The third provides the definition of weights in solving a multifactor problem. It is noted that such a model allows to proceed to the substantiation of operational and technical recommendations to the management of the group of special diving works.
The advantage of the new scientific result is the ability to obtain both quantitative estimates of the impact of the direct components of the system "diver-sapper – special means of underwater demining – underwater location of an explosive object" and their relationship. The disadvantage is the large number of experimental results that must be obtained to implement the selected plan.
References
2. Beck, A.J., Gledhill, M., Schlosser, C., Stamer, B., Böttcher, C., Sternheim, J., Greinert, J. and Achterberg, E.P. (2018). Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional Munitions Compounds in Coastal Marine Waters. Frontiers in Marine Science, 5(141). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00141
3. Ong, Caroline, Chapman, Tamara, Zilinskas, Raymond, Brodsky, Benjamin and Newman, Joshua (2013). Chemical Weapons Munitions Dumped at Sea: An Interactive Map. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. URL: http://cns.miis.edu/stories/090806_cw_dumping.htm
4. Long, Terrance P. (2013). An International Overview of Sea Dumped Chemical Weapons: The Way Forward. Conventional Weapons Convention Coalition. URL: http://www.cwccoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/longpaper.pdf
5. Matika, Dario, Barić, Slavko (2016). Maritime environmental security. Scientific Journal of Maritime Research, 30, 19–27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31217/p.30.1.3
6. Solovjov, I.I., Ctrilecz`, V.M. (2020) Problemni py`tannya vy`konannya robit z pidvodnogo rozminuvannya. Energozberezhennya ta promy`slova bezpeka: vy`kly`ky` ta perspekty`vy`. Tretya mizhnarodna naukovo-prakty`chna konferenciya. Ky`yiv: KPI, NNDI PBtaOP, 225–231. [in Ukrainian]
7. Nakaz DSNS Ukrayini N 461. (2018). «Pro zatverdzhennya Standartnoyi operaty`vnoyi procedury` 09.10-12(1)/DSNS "Poryadok provedennya organamy` ta pidrozdilamy` cy`vil`nogo zaxy`stu ochy`shhennya (rozminuvannya) tery`torij, zabrudneny`x vy`buxonebezpechny`my` predmetamy`. Operaty`vne reaguvannya"».
8. Nakaz DSNS Ukrayini N 68. (2020). «Pro realizaciyu osnovny`x zaxodiv z proty`minnoyi diyal`nosti u 2020 roci ta provedennya special`ny`x vy`buxovy`x robit».
9. Möller, Gunnar. (2011). From a DC-3 to BOSB: The Road to a Breakthrough in Military Safety Measures Against the Risks of Historic, Explosive Ordnance. Marine Technology Society Journal, 45(6), 26–34(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.6.1
10. IMAS 09.60:2014, IDT. Underwater Survey and Clearance of Explosive Ordnance (EO). URL: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/www.mineactionstandards.org_fileadmin_MAS_documents_imas-international-standards_english_series-09_IMAS_09.60_Underwater_Survey_and_Clearance_of_Explosive_Ordnance__EO_.pdf
11. Standard Operating Procedures for Humanitarian Underwater Demining in South Eastern Europe. URL: https://old.mineactionstandards.org/fileadmin/MAS/documents/references-publications/Humanitarian-Underwater-Demining-in-South-Eastern-Europe.pdf
12. Humanitarian Demining, Geneva International Centre for, "A Guide to Survey and Clearance of Underwater Explosive Ordnance" (2016). Global CWD Repository. 1326. URL: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd/1326
13. Maussang, F., Chanussot, J., Rombaut, M., Amate, M. (2009). From statistical detection to decision fusion: detection of underwater mines in high resolution SAS images. Advances in Sonar Technology, edited by Sergio Rui Silva, In-Tech, pp. 111–150, 978-3-902613-48-6. hal-02118475. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02118475/document
14. Mareike Kampmeier, Eefke M.van der Lee, UweWichert, JensGreinert (2020). Exploration of the munition dumpsite Kolberger Heide in Kiel Bay, Germany: Example for a standardised hydroacoustic and optic monitoring approach. Continental Shelf Research. Volume 198, 15 July 2020, 104108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2020.104108
15. Kotsyuruba, V., Tsibulya, S., Rybalko, V., (2019). Obosnovaniye primeneniya metoda vozdushnoy razvedki rayona intensivnogo primeneniya minnogo oruzhiya. Sotsialnoye razvitiye i bezopasnost, 9(1), 60–68.
16. Sayle, S., Windeyer, T., Charles, M., Conrod, S., Stephenson, M. (2009). Site Assessment and Risk Management Framework for Underwater Munitions. Marine Technology Society Journal, 43(4), 41–51(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.43.4.10
17. The British Army – Commando Engineer Diver. UK Ministry of Defence. URL: https://www.army.mod.uk/who-we-are/corps-regiments-and-units/corps-of-royal-engineers/ (Accessed 17 April 2017)
18. Werman, M., Loy, I. (2013). Training to Become Cambodia's First Underwater Deminers. The World (Arts, Culture & Media). URL: https://www.pri.org/stories/2013-03-07/training-become-cambodias-first-underwater-deminers
19. Mijajlovic, V. (2013). The Regional Center for Divers Training and Underwater Demining. The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, 17(2), Article 13. URL: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol17/iss2/13
20. Huet, C., Mastroddi, F. (2016). Autonomy for underwater robots – a European perspective. Autonomous Robot, 40, 1113–1118. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-016-9605-x
21. Cooper, N., Cooke, S., Burgess, K. (2018). Risky Business: Dealing with Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) in the Marine Environment. Conference Proceedings Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/cmsb.63174.0157
22. Mijajlovic, V. (2013). The Regional Center for Divers Training and Underwater Demining. The Journal of ERW and Mine Action, 17(2), Article 13. URL: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol17/iss2/13
23. Camilli, R., Bingham, B.S., Jakuba, M.V., Duryea, A.N., LeBouvier, R., Dock, M. (2009). AUV Sensors for Real-Time Detection, Localization, Characterization, and Monitoring of Underwater Munitions. Marine Technology Society Journal, 43(4), 76–84(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.43.4.6
24. Herbert, J. (2010). Risk Mitigation of Chemical Munitions in a Deep-Water Geohazard Assessment. Marine Technology Society Journal, 44(1), 86–96(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.44.1.4
25. Rancich, T. (2011). Search and Recovery of Munitions by Divers. Marine Technology Society Journal, 45(6), 75–79(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.45.6.9
26. Hrytsaienko, M. (2017). Development of the information platform model for the neutralization of potentially dangerous underwater objects. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 2(2(40), 57–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.129208
27. Olga Lucia Lopera Tellez, Alexander Borghgraef and Eric Mersch (2017). The Special Case of Sea Mines. Mine Action - The Research Experience of the Royal Military Academy of Belgium, Charles Beumier, Damien Closson, Vinciane Lacroix, Nada Milisavljevic and Yann Yvinec, IntechOpen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/66994
28. International Symposium Mine Action 2019 8 th to 11th April 2019, Slano, Croatia. URL:
http://www.ctro.hr/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Knjiga-za-web-4-mb.pdf
29. Olasunkanmi Habeeb Okunola (2019). Spatial analysis of disaster statistics in selected cities of Nigeria. International Journal of Emergency Management, 15(4), 299–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2019.104195
30. Ralf Josef Johanna Beerens (2019). Does the means achieve an end? A document analysis providing an overview of emergency and crisis management evaluation practice in the Netherlands. International Journal of Emergency Management, 15(3), 221–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2019.102310
31. Kayvan Yousefi Mojir, Sofie Pilemalm (2016). Actor-centred emergency response systems: a framework for needs analysis and information systems development. International Journal of Emergency Management, 12(4), 435–456. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2016.079844
32. Willem Treurniet, Kees Boersma, Peter Groenewegen (2019). Configuring emergency response networks. International Journal of Emergency Management, 15(4), 316 –333. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEM.2019.104200
33. Gibson, T.D. and Scott, N. (2019). Views from the Frontline and Frontline methodology: critical reflection on theory and practice. Disaster Prevention and Management, 28(1), 6–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2018-0214
34. Garnier, E. (2019). Lessons learned from the past for a better resilience to contemporary risks. Disaster Prevention and Management, 28(6), 786–803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0303
35. Strelec, V.M. (2001). Imitacionnyj analiz sistemy «chelovek-mashina» kak metod ehrgonomicheskoj ocenki funkcionirovaniya avarijnykh sluzhb. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij zhurnal «Radioehlektronika i informatika», 3(16), 125–128.
36. Natsionalnyi klasyfikator Ukrainy. Klasyfikator nadzvychainykh sytuatsii Ukrainy DK 019:2010. Pryiniato ta nadano chynnosti Nakazom Derzhspozhyvstandartu Ukrainy 11.10.2010 № 457.
37. Soloviov, I., Stetsiuk, Y., Strelets, V. (2020). Regularities of air consumption during underwater demining of water areas. Problems of Emergency Situations, 32, 132–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4400181
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
