FEATURES OF FIRE IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES ON HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS

Authors

  • А. Gavryliuk Lviv State University of Life Safety

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-1-175-118-124

Keywords:

electric vehicle, hydrogen fuel cel, fire hazard of electric vehicles

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to reveal the characteristics of combustion and hazards arising from fires and traffic accidents involving FCEVs, which will create the basis for new approaches to responding to such events, as well as safe working conditions for rescuers.

Description of the material. In general, the fire hazards associated with the use of FCEVs can be divided into the hazards associated with accidental hydrogen leakage and electric shock.

Hazards associated with hydrogen arise from the depressurization of mains, which leads to the accidental release of hydrogen into the environment. The release of hydrogen can be long-term or instantaneous as a result of an explosion. Let's analyze the hydrogen supply system used in the FCEV. In general, it can be divided into the hydrogen storage subsystem, the supply subsystem to the fuel cell, and the fuel cell subsystem itself. The hydrogen supply subsystem to the fuel cell carries a greater fire hazard than the fuel cell subsystem. When the line is depressurized, the mechanism for covering the supply of hydrogen from the tank is activated, and the leak stops. However, in the event of ignition, the hydrogen contained in the lines will be sufficient to become a source of ignition for other materials of the vehicle.

The hydrogen storage system carries the greatest fire hazard. To prevent an explosion due to heating of a hydrogen cylinder, a pressure valve is used, which is triggered by a thermal sensor when the temperature exceeds 90 ºС. Accidental handling of hydrogen can be accompanied by combustion. And with a faulty attitude valve, the worst situation from the point of view of fire danger can occur - an explosion.

Usually, the pressure release valve is placed under the bottom of the car perpendicularly down, or at an angle of 45º. With a hole diameter of 4.2 mm and a hydrogen pressure of 70 MPa, the length of the flame torch when hydrogen leaks in the direction perpendicular to the surface of the earth will be 6.4 m when it leaks at an angle of 45º - 8.8 m, and under the condition of unobstructed combustion, i.e. the car overturned - 10.2 m. When the diameter of the opening increases, the length of the flame torch increases.

The heat flow, which is formed due to the burning of hydrogen coming out of the car tank, can be 20 kW/m2 or more at a distance of 2-3 meters from the point of emission.

With a heat flow of 1.6 kW/m2, during long-term exposure, there are no painful effects. When the heat flow increases to 4-5 kW/m2, a person who has no means of protection will get a 1st degree burn in 20 seconds; under the action of a heat flow of 9.5 kW/m2, a 2nd degree burn is formed after 20 seconds; 12.5-15 kW/m2 of heat radiation causes a 3rd degree burn. The most dangerous event that can happen for safety reasons is an explosion of a hydrogen tank. Scientists Koshkarov and Molkov investigated the dangerous distances due to the explosion of a hydrogen cylinder. Therefore, in the case of an explosion of a hydrogen cylinder with a volume of 100 l at a pressure of 70 MPa, lethal consequences occur at a distance of up to 8 m, and the zone of severe and medium injuries reaches up to 28 m. The safe distance for such a case is more than 100 m. It is obvious that from the increase pressure and volume of the balloon and such distance increases.

Author Biography

А. Gavryliuk, Lviv State University of Life Safety

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

References

Skirienė, A. F., & Stasiškienė, Ž. (2021). COVID-19 and air pollution: Measuring pandemic impact to air quality in five european countries. Atmosphere, 12(3). doi:10.3390/atmos12030290

European Environmental Agency. Explaining Road Transport Emissions: A Non-Technical Guide. Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/explaining-road-transport-emissions

European Union. Monitoring CO2 Emissions from Passenger Cars and Vans in 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/co2-emissions-from-cars-and-vans-2018

Ventura, L. M. B., Ramos, M. B., D'Agosto, M. D. A., & Gioda, A. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of the national strike of the road freight transport sector on the air quality of the metropolitan region of rio de janeiro, brazil. Sustainable Cities and Society, 65. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2020.102588

Nguyen, T. A., & Mikami, M. (2013). Effect of hydrogen addition to intake air on combustion noise from a diesel engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(10), 4153-4162. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.082

Rodionov, A., Wilkening, H., & Moretto, P. (2011). Risk assessment of hydrogen explosion for private car with hydrogen-driven engine. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(3), 2398-2406. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.089

Aguilar, P., & Groß, B. (2022). Battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles, an analysis of alternative powertrains as a mean to decarbonise the transport sector. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 53. doi:10.1016/j.seta.2022.102624

Trencher, G., & Wesseling, J. (2022). Roadblocks to fuel-cell electric vehicle diffusion: Evidence from Germany, Japan and California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2022.103458

Teimouri, A., Zayer Kabeh, K., Changizian, S., Ahmadi, P., & Mortazavi, M. (2022). Comparative lifecycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell, electric, CNG, and gasoline-powered vehicles under real driving conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(89), 37990-38002. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.298

Gavryliuk, A. F., & Kushnir, A. P. (2022). Analysis of fire danger of electric vehicles according to thermal stability of powerful lithium battery. Fire Safety, 40, 31-39. DOI: 10.32447/20786662.40.2022.04.

Gavryliuk А. F. (2021). Study of fuel and equivalent economy of transport vehicles, operating on conventional and alternative types of fuel. Scientific Works of Vinnytsia National Technical University. № 2. Retrieved from: DOI:10.31649/2307-5376-2021-2-32-39.

EAFO. European Alternative Fuels Observatory-Transport Mode n.d. Retrieved from: https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/transport-mode/road

Samsun, R. C., Rex, M., Antoni, L., & Stolten, D. (2022). Deployment of fuel cell vehicles and hydrogen refueling station infrastructure: A global overview and perspectives. Energies, 15(14). doi:10.3390/en15144975

Da-sol, K. Hyundai Nexo zaimaie polovynu svitovykh prodazhiv FCEV. Retrieved from: http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20211230000656

Zhang, J., Hou, F., Wang, J., Song, Z., Baronas, J., Li, H., & Li, K. (2022). General Report: Ready to Go, the “Dual Carbon” Goals Are Leading the “Hydrogen Era”.

Pokaznyky prodazhiv Toyota Mirai v SShA. Rezhym dostupu: https://carfigures.com/us-market-brand/toyota/mirai

Pokaznyky prodazhiv Hyundai Nexo u SShA. Rezhym dostupu: https://carfigures.com/us-market-brand/hyundai/nexo

Zhang, C., Cao, X., Bujlo, P., Chen, B., Zhang, X., Sheng, X., & Liang, C. (2022). Review on the safety analysis and protection strategies of fast filling hydrogen storage system for fuel cell vehicle application. Journal of Energy Storage, 45. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.103451

Pan, R.; Yang, D.; Wang, Y.J.; Chen, Z.H. (2020) Performance degradation prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using a hybrid prognostic approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 45, 30994–31008

Sharma, S., & Ghoshal, S. K. (2015). Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: From production to applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 1151-1158. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.093

Gavryliuk, A. F., & Kushnir, A. P. (2022). Analysis of fire danger of electric vehicles according to thermal stability of powerful lithium battery. Fire Safety, 40, 31-39. DOI: 10.32447/20786662.40.2022.04.

Dadashzadeh, M., Kashkarov, S., Makarov, D., & Molkov, V. (2018). Risk assessment methodology for onboard hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(12), 6462-6475.

Kashkarov, S., Li, Z., & Molkov, V. (2016). Nomograms for assessment of hazard distances from a blast wave after high-pressure hydrogen cylinder rupture in a fire. In 8th International Seminar on Fire & Explosion Hazards. International Seminar on Fire and Explosion Hazards.

Sun, K., & Li, Z. (2021). Development of emergency response strategies for typical accidents of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(75), 37679-37696.

Addai, E. K., Gabel, D., Kamal, M., & Krause, U. (2016). Minimum ignition energy of hybrid mixtures of combustible dusts and gases. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 102, 503-512.

Mogi, T., Nishida, H., & Horiguchi, S. (2005). Flame Characteristics of high-pressure hydrogen gas jet.

Аchance, J., Tchouvelev, A., & Engebo, A. (2011). Development of uniform harm criteria for use in quantitative risk analysis of the hydrogen infrastructure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(3), 2381-2388. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.139

Kashkarov, S., Li, Z., & Molkov, V. (2020). Blast wave from a hydrogen tank rupture in a fire in the open: Hazard distance nomograms. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(3), 2429-2446. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.084

J. Hord Is hydrogen a safe fuel? Int J Hydrogen Energy, 3 (1978), pp. 157-176.

Published

2023-04-03

How to Cite

Gavryliuk А. (2023). FEATURES OF FIRE IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES ON HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1(175), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-1-175-118-124