ERGONOMICS 4.0: DIGITALIZATION PROBLEMS AND OVERCOMING THEM

Authors

  • О. Protasenko Simon Kuznets Kharkov National University of Economics
  • G. Mygal The National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-3-177-182-188

Keywords:

ergonomics 4.0, digitalization, operator, digital environment, digital ecosystem, ergonomic thinking

Abstract

The article aims to research the impact of digitalization on operator activity. The main concepts and components of the digital environment are considered. The research directions of human-machine interaction in the digital environment are analysed. The problems of digitalization and their impact on the safety and efficiency of the operator's activities are studied. The “Ergonomics 4.0” conception, which combines existing ergonomic trends in the study of the digital environment, creates a single conceptual apparatus and is the basis for developing practical methods for increasing the safety and efficiency of human-machine interaction in the digital environment.

Author Biographies

О. Protasenko, Simon Kuznets Kharkov National University of Economics

PhD (Engin.), Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor at the Department of hotel and restaurant business

G. Mygal, The National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Dr. Sci. (Engin.), Full Professor, Professor at the Department of Automobile and Transportation Infrastructure

References

Caterino, M., Rinaldi, M., FeraM. (2023). Digital ergonomics: an evaluation framework for the ergonomic risk assessment of heterogeneous workers. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36(2), 239-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2090023

Franssilaa, H., Okkonena, J., Savolainena R. (2016). Developing measures for information ergonomics in knowledge work. Ergonomics, 59(3), 435-448. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1073795

Mygal, G. V., Protasenko, O. F. (2018). New concepts of modern ergonomics. Open information and computer integrated technologies, no. 79, 162-171.

Protasenko, O. F., Mygal, G. V. (2021). Human factors: the problem of man-machine interaction under the digitalization conditions. Scientific journal of Polonia University, № 48 (5), 198-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23856/4825

Parasuraman, R., Mehta, R. (2013). Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, no. 7, 889. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889

Work 4.0. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_4.0

Mygal, G., Protasenko, O., Kobrina, N., Mykhailova E. (2023). Ergonomic thinking in the design of human-machine systems. Bulletin of the National Technical University “KhPI”, no. 1(15), 42-52. doi: 10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06

Kolot, A., Herasymenko, O. (2020). Labor 4.0 concept: theoretical-applicable principles of formation and development. Ekon. Prognozuvannâ, no 1, 7-31. https://doi.org/10.15407/eip2020.01.007

Kraus, К., Kraus, N., Holubka, S. (2022). Establishment of work 4.0 in the conditions of digitalization and the application of artificial intelligence. European scientific journal of Economic and Financial innovation, no 2(10), 19-31. DOI: 10.32750/2022-0202

Schlund, S., Kamusella, C., Knott, V. (2022). Digital ergonomics and digital work planning in university education: experiences from Germany and Austria. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 76, 510-524. DOI: 10.1007/s41449-022-00333-7

Digital Ergonomics. Retrieved from: http://surl.li/ghspt

What are Computer Ergonomics? Retrieved from: http://surl.li/ghsqa

Franssila, H., Okkonen, J., Savolainen, R. (2015). Developing measures for information ergonomics in knowledge work. Ergonomics, 59(3), 435-448. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1073795

Horda, O. V. (2020). Erhonomika informatsiinykh tekhnolohii: konspekt lektsii. Kyiv : KNUBA, 83с.

Kulesz, O. (2017). Culture in the Digital Environment. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 64 p.

Protasenko, O. F., Ivashura, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness and safety of students’ work with digital learning ecosystem. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, no 51(2), 337-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23856/5140

Yatskevych, I. V., Krasnostanova, N. E. (2021). Digital technologies in business. Economic theory, no 1 (73), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.33271/ebdut/73.038

Kulynych, M. (2019). Digital transformation of domestic enterprises in current conditions. Economics, Management and Administration, (3(89), 8–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26642/ema-2019-3(89)-8-15

Protasenko, O., Mygal, G. (2021). Human Factors: The Problem of Man-machine Interaction in the Digitalization. Scientific Journal of Polonia University, no 48(5), 198-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23856/4825

Hobfoll, S., Stevensa, N., Zalta, A. (2015). Expanding the Science of Resilience: Conserving Resources in the Aid of Adaptation. Psychological Inquiry., no 26, 174-180. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2015.1002377

Holmgreen, L., Tirone, V., Gerhart, J., Hobfoll, S. (2017). Conservation of resources theory. The handbook of stress and

health: а guide to research and practice, 2 (7), 443-457. DOI: 10.1002/9781118993811.ch27

Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., Schaufeli, W.B. (2017). The Role of Personal Resources in the Job Demands-Resources Model. International Journal of Stress

Management, 14 (2), 121-141. DOI: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121

Mygal, G., Protasenko, O. (2020). Human resources are a factor in applying of man-machine systems safety. Municipal Economy of Cities., 6(159), 39-146. DOI: 10.33042/2522-1809-2020-6-159-139-146

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

How to Cite

Protasenko О., & Mygal, G. (2023). ERGONOMICS 4.0: DIGITALIZATION PROBLEMS AND OVERCOMING THEM. Municipal Economy of Cities, 3(177), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-3-177-182-188