ANALYSIS OF CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONS IN THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE EVENTS OF THE BAIKONUR DISASTER

Authors

  • V. Tsopa International Institute of Management
  • S. Cheberyachko Dnipro University of Technology
  • О. Deryugin Dnipro University of Technology
  • N. Sushko Dnipro University of Technology
  • О. Sharovatova National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-4-178-252-261

Keywords:

disaster, danger, cause-and-effect relationships, risk assessment

Abstract

Identifying the causes of disasters, emergency situations, and incidents is a necessary condition for avoiding similar situations in the future. The methods of the theory of catastrophes are constantly being improved, there is a need to return to some historical negative events, the analysis of which contributes to the discovery of new grounds, facts, consequences that update the essence of the emergence of an emergency situation, and allow managers, specialists and employees of any industry, association, enterprises or organizations to make security decisions. This study revealed cause-and-effect relationships in the chronology of events that led to the "Nedelin Disaster" - the worst and most fatal disaster in the rocket and space industry of the Soviet Union and the world, when the Soviet intercontinental ballistic missile R-16 exploded during a test at the start during launch preparation. The assessment of the occupational risk of hazards was carried out on the basis of the "bow-tie" model, which is a schematic method of describing and analyzing the ways of the development of a dangerous event from causes to consequences by combining the "fault tree analysis" and "event tree". This model is widely used because of its convenience and simplicity in representing the cause-and-effect relationship between a hazard, a hazardous event, and consequences. Its visualization helps to clearly demonstrate the process of managing occupational risks by determining the number of barriers (protective or preventive measures) that are placed on the path between danger and a dangerous event and a dangerous event and consequences. The number of barriers makes it possible, on the one hand, to establish an estimate of preventive and protective measures for labor protection, and on the other hand, to influence the probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event. The highlighted events, their analysis, understanding of the dangers and knowledge of the consequences of a dangerous event made it possible to build a model of the realized risk of danger with the definition of the main dangerous conditions that led to the disaster. In particular, the main dangerous conditions are: supplying fuel to the engine, installing the electric battery one hour before launch, giving an electric signal to start the rocket engine one minute before the crash and 15 minutes before launch. As a result of the combination of all three dangerous conditions, the probability of a dangerous event has increased to 100%. Another dangerous condition was the presence of a significant number of people to launch the rocket, which led to a significant severity of casualties - from 20 people to 100 or more. It is important that each of these factors alone could not affect the danger of preparing the rocket for launch, but their combination led to the disaster.

Author Biographies

V. Tsopa, International Institute of Management

Dr. Sci. (Engin.), Full Professor, Professor at the Department of Management

S. Cheberyachko, Dnipro University of Technology

Dr. Sci. (Engin.), Full Professor, Professor at the Department of Labour Protection and Civil Safety

О. Deryugin, Dnipro University of Technology

PhD (Engin.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Transportation Management

N. Sushko, Dnipro University of Technology

Postgraduate at the Department of Labour Protection and Civil Safety

О. Sharovatova, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD (Pedag.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of  Labor Protection and Technogenic and Environmental Safety

References

Sheehan, N. (2010). A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon. Studies in Intelligence, 54(3), 41-43. Retrieved from: https://www.cia.gov/static/f189aa1601ca80594964c26b9ead461f/Fiery-Peace-Cold-War.pdf

Boltenko, O. (2015) Katastrofa na Baikonuri. Ofitsiinyi sait Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy «Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut imeni Ihoria Sikorskoho». Retrieved from: https://kpi.ua/1533-1b (data zvernennia: 24.04.2023). Nazva z ekrana.

Gingerich, D.E., Forrest, J.S., Abiin, A.A., Maricle-Fitzpatrick, T.M. (2015). The Russian R-16 Nedelin Disaster: An Historical Analysis of Failed Safety Management. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 2(2), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-8967(16)30052-0

Naomi, O., Krige, J. (2014) Science and Technology in the Global Cold War. Cambridge, MA; online edn, MIT Press Scholarship Online, 21 May 2015. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027953.001.0001

Azriel, M. (2014) The Nedelin Catastrophe, Part 1. Space Safety Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-disasters/nedelin-catastrophe/historys-launch-padfailures-nedelin-disaster-part-1/

Voicu, І., Panaitescu, F.V., Panaitescu, M., Dumitrescu, L.G., Turof, M. (2018). Risk management with Bowtie diagrams. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 400(8), 082021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/400/8/082021

Alani, S.H.N., Mahjoob, A.M.R. (2021). Corruption Risk Analysis at the Project Planning Stage in the Iraqi Construction Sector using the Bowtie Methodology. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 11(3), 7223-7227. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.4060

Kotre, C.J. (2022). ALARP: when does reasonably practicable become rather pricey? The British Journal of Radiology, 1;95(1138), 20220612. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220612

Katastrofa na Baikonuri (1960) Vikipediia - vilna entsyklopediia. Retrieved from: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Катастрофа_на_Байконурі_(1960) (data zvernennia: 24.04.2023). Nazva z ekrana.

Chukalova, R., Kakenova, Z., Kushpaeva, A. (2018). The role of Baikonur in the context of military-political cooperation between Kazakhstan and Russia. Opcion, 34(85), 551-581. Retrieved from: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/310/31055914025/31055914025.pdf

Villain, J. (1996). A brief history of Baikonur". Acta astronautica, 38(2), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(96)00005-7

Sabden, O. (2011). Uspehi ne osporimy. Economicheskoe razvitie Kazakhstana za 20 let nezavisimosti ". Kazakhstanskaya pravda, 4(5), 45-80.

Mansurov, V., Yurchenko, O., Allsop, J. and Saks, M. (2004). The Anglo-American and Russian sociology of professions: Comparisons and perspectives. Knowledge, Work and Society, 2(2), 23-49.

Mike Gruntman (2019) From Tyuratam Missile Range to Baikonur Cosmodrome. Acta Astronautica, Volume, 155, p. 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.12.021

David E. Gingerich, Jeffrey S. Forrest, Andrei A. Abiin, Taletha M. Maricle-Fitzpatrick. (2015) The Russian R-16 Nedelin Disaster: An Historical Analysis of Failed Safety Management, Journal of Space Safety Engineering, Volume 2, Issue 2, P. 65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-8967(16)30052-0

Albert D. Wheelon (2004) Technology and intelligence, Technology in Society, Volume 26, Issues 2–3, P. 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.01.026

Maikanov, B.S., Auteleyeva, L.T., Zhubatov, Z.K., Terlikbayev, A.A., Kamsaev, K.M. (2022). The Effect of an Accidental Carrier Rocket Crash on Soil and Vegetation Cover. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/144386

Dr. Joseph N. Yoon, “Nedelin Disaster”, Aerospaceweb.org. Retrieved from: www.aerospaceweb.org/question/spacecraft/q0179.shtml

Platonov V. (2000) Posle katastrof. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. №45. Retrieved from: https://rvsn.ruzhany.info/platonov_02_01.html

Robert Kopack (2021) Baikonur 2.0: ‘inland-offshore’ space economies in post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Culture, Theory and Critique, 62:1-2, 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2021.1929363

Boltenko O. (2012) Katastrofa na Baikonure. Doslidzhennia z istorii tekhniky. Vypusk 16. S. 17–27. Retrieved from: http://journal.museum.kpi.ua/archive/2012-vol-16/RHT-issue-16-title-02-Boltenko.pdf

Published

2023-09-04

How to Cite

Tsopa, V., Cheberyachko, S., Deryugin О., Sushko, N., & Sharovatova О. (2023). ANALYSIS OF CAUSE-EFFECT RELATIONS IN THE CHRONOLOGY OF THE EVENTS OF THE BAIKONUR DISASTER. Municipal Economy of Cities, 4(178), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-4-178-252-261