TRANSFORMATION OF SAFETY CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALISATION

Authors

  • O. Protasenko Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
  • Ye. Mykhailova Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-1-182-223-228

Keywords:

safety culture, digitalisation, employee

Abstract

Today, many industries across the globe are showing interest in the concept of safety culture. They consider the concept as a means to reduce the risk of accidents and disasters. However, despite the importance of the concept development, its formation and implementation have been accompanied by a significant number of complications, which arose because of the fragmentation and unsystematic nature of research on the development of safety culture and its importance for various industries. Nowadays, the situation has become more complicated due to the rapid digitalisation of industry, which has fundamentally changed the principles of operation of many industries. At the same time, safety culture is essential to ensuring an organisation’s sustainable development, requiring various activities to be coordinated and jointly implemented by the personnel who support the organisation’s smooth operation. Thus, organisations with a high risk of danger must observe the impact of digital transformation on developing a safety culture.

The authors have considered and analysed the essential characteristics of safety culture to investigate the transformation of safety culture in digitalisation conditions. Based on this, we identified four types of safety culture. The analysis of culture types showed the advantages and disadvantages of introducing each culture type into an organisation’s activities. The study has established that the integral culture is the most effective. A high level of safety training for employees, attended by all employees from the lowest level to the CEO, characterises this type of culture. In addition, under this culture type, the organisation uses the most modern achievements to create safe and comfortable working conditions for all employees. Analysis of characteristics and types of safety culture has led to the conclusion that implementing a safety culture in an organisation is an effective tool for improving the working conditions of employees and, therefore, should be applied in the new digital reality. The next step was researching the transformation of safety culture in the context of digitalisation. The results revealed the advantages of digitalisation for the safety culture development of an organisation. The most significant benefits are reduced hazardous operations, improved reporting and hazard prevention effectiveness, improved team communication and collaboration, and increased regulatory compliance.

Author Biographies

O. Protasenko, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Healthy Lifestyle, Technologies and Life Safety

Ye. Mykhailova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Healthy Lifestyle, Technologies and Life Safety

References

Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00035-7

Naji, G. M. A., Isha, A. S. N., Mohyaldinn, M. E., Leka, S., Saleem, M. S., Rahman, S. M. N. B. S. A., & Alzoraiki, M. (2021). Impact of Safety Culture on Safety Performance; Mediating Role of Psychosocial Hazard: An Integrated Modelling Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168568

Naji, G. M. A., Isha, A. S. N., Alazzani, A., Saleem, M. S., & Alzoraiki, M. (2022). Assessing the Mediating Role of Safety Communication Between Safety Culture and Employees Safety Performance. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 840281. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.840281

Tengilimoglu, D., Celik, E., & Guzel, A. (2016). The Effect of Safety Culture on Safety Performance: Intermediary Role of Job Satisfaction. British Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 15(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJEMT/2016/29975

Tobin, R. (2023, June 20). What Is a Safety Culture and Why Do You Need One? EHS Today. http://surl.li/raews

Protasenko, O., & Mygal, G. (2023). Ergonomics 4.0: digitalization problems and overcoming them. Municipal Economy of Cities. Series: Engineering science and architecture, 3(177), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-3-177-182-188

Illiashenko, O., Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Protasenko, O. (2021). A Convergent Approach to the Viability of the Dynamical Systems: The Cognitive Value of Complexity. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 11(6), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110612

IAEA. (1992). The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1 – INSAG-7. A report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. International Atomic Energy Agency. http://surl.li/rafaf

Jabłoński, M., & Jabłoński, A. (2021). Shaping the Safety Culture of High Reliability Organizations through Digital Transformation. Energies, 14(16), 4721. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164721

Uttal, B. (1983). The Corporate Culture Vultures. Fortune, 108(8), 66–72.

Khan, F., Amyotte, P., & Adedigba, S. (2021). Process safety concerns in process system digitalization. Education for Chemical Engineers, 34, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.11.002

Zaoui, F., & Souissi, N. (2020). Roadmap for digital transformation: A literature review. Procedia Computer Science, 175, 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.07.090

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Teece, D. J. (2018). Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world. Research Policy, 47(8), 1367–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015

Wilson, J. R. (2014). Fundamentals of systems ergonomics/human factors. Applied Ergonomics, 45(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.021

Partida, D. (2021, October 7). How does your safety culture impact workers? ISHN. http://surl.li/rafpb

Ndedi, A., & Kok, L. (2017). The Importance of Occupational Health and Safety Culture in Manufacturing Companies. SSRN. Research Paper Series, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3026353

Reason, J. (1998). Achieving a safe culture: theory and practice. Work & Stress, 12(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379808256868

Sexton, J. B., Adair, K. C., Profit, J., Bae, J., Rehder, K. J., Gosselin, T., Milne, J., Leonard, M., & Frankel, A. (2021). Safety Culture and Workforce Well-Being Associations with Positive Leadership WalkRounds. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 47(7), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.04.001

Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2007). Safety culture: Analysis of the causal relationships between its key dimensions. Journal of Safety Research, 38(6), 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.001

Mygal, G., Protasenko, O., Kobrina, N., & Mykhailova, E. (2023). Ergonomic thinking in the design of human-machine systems. Bulletin of the National Technical University “KhPI”. Series: New Solutions in Modern Technologies, (1(15), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-4295.2023.01.06

Protasenko, O., & Mygal, G. (2020). Eco-ergonomic Designing of Working Environment. Open Information and Computer Integrated Technologies, (89), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.32620/oikit.2020.89.09

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Protasenko, O., & Mykhailova, Y. (2024). TRANSFORMATION OF SAFETY CULTURE IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALISATION. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1(182), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-1-182-223-228