GEOINFORMATION RESOURCES AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING GEODATA SETS ON RESTRICTIONS

Authors

  • O. Petrakovska Київський національний університет будівництва і архіте ктури
  • M. Mykhalova Київський національний університет будівництва і архітектури

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-6-187-204-210

Keywords:

restrictions, geospatial data, metadata, state land cadastre, urban planning cadastre

Abstract

In today's world, where the use of information technology and geographic information systems is gaining particular relevance and becoming an integral part of many industries, including land management and cadastre. The implementation of the national geospatial data infrastructure in Ukraine was a response to changes in economic conditions, societal needs for all types of geographic information, technological capabilities and integration into global and European geospatial data infrastructures. The relevance, reliability, completeness, integrity, accuracy, validity and officialness of geospatial data are critical to ensuring effective land management. An important aspect of creating geodata sets is responsibility for their quality and reliability. Responsible persons involved in the creation and management of geographic information resources must comply with standards and requirements that ensure data reliability. The article analyzes the types of geospatial data that reflect various aspects of land use restrictions according to the legally defined composition of geospatial data. The article also considers holders of thematic geospatial data responsible for creating and updating geospatial data sets and metadata, taking into account their industry affiliation. The analysis of the holders responsible for creating and updating geospatial datasets and metadata for the above thematic data on restrictions revealed that the main ones are the State Service of Ukraine for Geodesy, Cartography and Cadastre and the Ministry of Communities and Territories Development of Ukraine. According to the results of the research, it was found that a certain list of restrictions mandatory for registration in the State Land Cadastre is not included in geospatial data and the main geodata sets directly related to land use restrictions names: “nature protection areas and objects” (9), ‘types of land use’ (17), ‘territorial zones, zones of regulation, restrictions on land use and accounting units’ (24), ‘world heritage sites, their territories and buffer zones, cultural heritage sites’ (34). The main geoinformation resources for their creation are the state land cadastre and urban planning cadastre.

Author Biographies

O. Petrakovska, Київський національний університет будівництва і архіте ктури

доктор технічних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри землеустрою і кадастру

M. Mykhalova, Київський національний університет будівництва і архітектури

кандидат технічних наук, доцент, професор кафедри землеустрою і кадастру

References

On Approval of the Procedure for the Functioning of the National Geospatial Data Infrastructure: Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers No 532, 26.05.2021 – [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/532-2021-п#Text.

On Approval of the Procedure for Maintaining the State Land Cadastre. Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 1051, 17.10.2012 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1051-2012

About the national geospatial data infrastructure. Law of Ukraine No. 554-IX, 31.12.2023 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/554-20#Text

About the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 2456-XII, 16.06.1992 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2456-12#Text

Hwang S. Conceptual framework for using GIS in building community capital towards sustainability. In: Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Techniques, Applications and Technologies. Editor: D. Nielson. – Nova Science Publishers, Inc, 2014, pp.37 – 66.

OGC (2004). Open Geospatial Consortium. Geospatial Portal Reference Architecture, 23p. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/ ?artifact_id=6669

Rajabifard, A., Binns, A., Masser, I., Williamson, I. The role of sub-national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 20, 2006, pp. 727–741.GSDI Association. (2004). Global Spatial Data Infrastructure: The SDI Cookbook, Ver. 2.0. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://gsdiassociation.org/images/publications/cookbooks/ SDI_Cookbook_GSDI_2004_ver2.pdf.

The New European Interoperability Framework [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/eif_en

UN. (2011). Global Geospatial Information Management. New York: United Nations. E/2011/89

Карпінський Ю.О. Основи створення інтероперабельних геопросторових даних. / Ю.О. Карпінський та ін. – Київ: КНУБА, 2023. – 302 с. Режим доступу: https://land.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/maket_r1-5_25_05_2023.pdf.

Lyashchenko, A., Karpinsky, Y., Gavrilyuk, E., & Cherin, A. (2021). Methods and means of ensuring interoperability of components of the national geospatial data infrastructure. Urban planning and territorial planning, (77), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2021.77.309-319

Petrakovska, O., & Mykhalova, M. (2023). Approaches to classification and registration of land use limitations. Spatial development, (6), 329–337. https://doi.org/10.32347/2786-7269.2023.6.329-337

Published

2024-12-17

How to Cite

Petrakovska, O., & Mykhalova, M. (2024). GEOINFORMATION RESOURCES AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING GEODATA SETS ON RESTRICTIONS. Municipal Economy of Cities, 6(187), 204–210. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-6-187-204-210

Issue

Section

статьи