THE SIGNIFICANCE OF BASIC COMFORT FEATURES IN THE AESTHETIC PERCEPTION OF PARK ENVIRONMENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-1-189-171-180Keywords:
recreation, aesthetics, park, landscapeAbstract
The study presents the results of a comprehensive analysis of the aesthetic perception of park landscapes in Mariinsky Park and Slava Park (Kyiv) involving 76 respondents. The research was conducted four times (in spring, summer, autumn, and winter) using different approaches—direct evaluation in the park environment and remote evaluation through photographs. The application of different research methods allowed for a comparative analysis of the negative impact of environmental factors related to recreational comfort on landscape perception and aesthetic evaluation.
A review of scientific literature revealed significant contributions by scholars in the study of aesthetic landscape perception, the identification of factors influencing its aesthetic qualities, and the modeling of aesthetically appealing landscapes. Contemporary researchers focus primarily on determining urban park visitors’ needs and aesthetic preferences, emphasizing a subject-oriented approach. While identifying and considering visitors’ needs through the assessment of environmental quality characteristics that enhance aesthetic perception is essential, the issue of determining factors that negatively impact recreational comfort remains largely overlooked.
Experimental research identified substantial differences in the frequency of mentions of environmental features depending on the research method across all seasons. Mentions were more frequent when the study was conducted directly in the park, with the smallest seasonal differences observed in summer and the largest in autumn for both locations. During autumn, a very weak correlation was found in Mariinsky Park, whereas a moderate correlation was observed in Slava Park. Additionally, in summer, when evaluating Slava Park in situ, the correlation between the frequency of mentions of negative comfort-related environmental features and aesthetic evaluation was the strongest.
Furthermore, a relationship was found between environmental comfort and respondents’ attention to park space components when assessments were conducted directly in the park. Under deteriorating comfort conditions, attention to the unsatisfactory state of both natural and artificial park elements decreased. Conversely, under comfortable conditions, respondents focused more on material components, including their poor condition, which significantly affected the aesthetic evaluation of park landscapes.
The negative impact of artificial components on aesthetic evaluation was primarily determined by the volumetric-spatial structure of the park and the condition of plantings, with less influence from the research method used. This is evidenced by a stronger correlation between artificial components and the aesthetic evaluation of Slava Park, where monumental objects dominate the spatial composition, compared to Mariinsky Park, where vegetation is the dominant feature. The greater species diversity and compositional role of plantings in Mariinsky Park resulted in a stronger influence on aesthetic evaluation, as well asґ seasonal variability in this effect.
References
Олексійченко Н. О. Особливості впливу середовища на оцінювання естетичних якостей паркових пейзажів: теоретичні та прикладні аспекти / Н. О. Олексійченко, Н. В. Гатальська //. Наукові праці Лісівничої академії наук України :зб. наук. праць / ЛАНУ. – Київ, 2018. Вип. 17. – С. 72-84. doi.org/10.15421/411822 – Режим доступу : http://fasu.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/nplanu/article/view/227/172, вільний (дата звернення 05.03.2025). – Назва з екрана.
Спиридонова Л. К. Асоціативний експеримент як засіб дослідження образу світу / Л. К. Спиридонова // Наука і освіта: Наук.-практ. журнал Південноукраїнського національного педагогічного університету імені К. Д. Ушинського / ПНПУ ім. К. Д. Ушинського – Одеса, 2015. Вип. 1. – С. 152-158.
Angeliki P. Historical Public Parks: Investigating Contemporary Visitor Needs [Electronic resource] / P. Angeliki, K. Andreas, M. Chrysovalantis // Sustainability – Electronic text data. – 2020. Vol. 12 (23). – 9976. doi: 10.3390/su12239976 – Regime of access: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/23/9976, free (date of the application: 01.03.2025). – Header from the screen. 4. Arriaz M. Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes [Electronic resource] / Arriaz M. Cañas-Ortega J.F., Cañas-Madueño, Aviles P.R. // Landscape and Urban Planning, – Electronic text data. – 2003. Vol. 69 (1). – P. 115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029, – Regime of access: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169204603002469, free (date of the application: 01.03.2025). – Header from the screen.
Bazac T. Sustainable Management Decisions for Urban Historical Parks: A Case Study Based on Online Referential Values of Carol I Park in Bucharest, Romania [Electronic resource] / T. Bazac, S. Marin, C. Oltenu, A. Hottoi // Sustainability – Electronic text data. – 2023. Vol. 15. – 14456. doi: 10.3390/su151914456 – Regime of access: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14456, free (date of the application: 01.03.2025). – Header from the screen.
Csomós G. Exploring the use and perceptions of inner-city small urban parks: A case study of Budapest, Hungary / G. Csomós, B. Szabó, J. Z. Farkas, Z. Bertus // Urban Forestry & Urban Greening / Elsevier – Amsterdam, 2023. Vol. 86. – 128003. doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128003.
Elbakidze M. Multiple factors shape the interaction of people with urban greenspace: Sweden as a case study / M. Elbakidze, L. Dawson, P. Milberg, G. Mikusiński, M. Hedblom, I. Kruhlov, T. Yamelynets, Ch. Schaffer, K.-E. Johansson, M. Grodzynskyi // Urban Foresty & Urban Greening / Elsevier – Amsterdam, 2022. Vol. 74. –127672. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127672.
Enssle F. Urban green spaces for the social interaction, health and wellbeing of older people – an integrated view of urban ecosystem services and socio-environmental justice / F. Enssle, N. Kabisch // Environmental Science & Policy / Chesterton, 2020. Vol. 109, - P. 36–44. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008. 9. Gil J.-H. Analysis on Trends in the Designation and Development of Historical Parks in Korea / Ji-Hye Gil, Hee-Soung Park, Jae-Min Park // Journal of Korean Institute of Lanscape Architecture / The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. – Seoul, 2016. Vol. 44 (2). – P.130-142. doi: 10.9715/KILA.2016.44.2.130.
Jahani A. Aesthetic preference and mental restoration prediction in urban parks: An application of environmental modeling approach / A. Jahani, M. Saffariha // Urban Forestry & Urban Greenung – Electronic text data. –2020. Vol. 54. – 126775. doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126775 – Regime of access: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S161886
6720305926, free (date of the application: 01.03.2025). – Header from the screen.
Jahani A. Environmental modeling of landscape aesthetic value in natural urbanparks using artificial neural network technique / A. Jahani, Sh. Allahverdi, M. Saffriha., A. Alitvoli, S. Ghiyasi // Modeling Earth Systems and Environment / Springer Nature. 2022, Vol. 8, – P. 163-172. doi: 10.1007/s40808-020-01068-2
Kaplan A. Assessing the Visual Quality of Rural and Urban-fringed Landscapes surrounding Livestock Farms / A. Kaplan, T. Taşkin, A. Örenҫ // Biosystems Engineering / American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers. – St. Joseph, 2006. Vol. 95(3), P. – 437-448. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.07.011.
Maas J. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health / J. Maas, S. M. E .van Dillen, R. A .Verheij, P. P. Groenewegen // Health & Place / Elsevier – Amsterdam, 2009. Vol. 15 (2). – P. 586-595. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.006.
Oleksichenko N. Methodological approaches to assess the aesthetics of park environment [Electronic resource] / N. Oleksichenko N., Gatalska N. // Forestry Ideas – Electronic text data. – 2018. Vol. 24 (2). – P. 141–162. Regime of access: https://forestry-ideas.info/issues/issues_Download.php?download=306, free (date of the application: 01.03.2025). – Header from the screen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
