ANALYSIS OF NORMATIVE LABOR CONSISTENCE OF STRENGTH-MONOLITH STRUCTURES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-1-189-258-265Keywords:
labor intensity, standards, structures, modelingAbstract
The work is dedicated to the study of the domestic regulatory framework for the construction of prefabricated and monolithic structures over the past 50 years. An analysis of the current regulatory documents, which serve as the basis for calculating labor intensity, machine intensity, and work costs, has been conducted. The conclusion drawn is that these regulations cannot be directly applied to prefabricated-monolithic technologies.
Regulations developed for traditional technologies (monolithic and prefabricated reinforced concrete) often inadequately reflect the actual costs associated with new, more efficient solutions. In the context of prefabricated-monolithic construction, the situation is further complicated by the absence of specialized regulations. There are standards for the construction of both prefabricated and monolithic structures, but when these technologies are combined, simple summation of values often leads to an obviously overestimated assessment of time and cost.
There are no specific regulations for determining the labor intensity of prefabricated-monolithic construction. Instead, separate standards exist for prefabricated and monolithic structures. Moreover, detailed regulation of prefabricated and monolithic construction was carried out 40 years ago. Since then, more productive machinery and equipment, efficient tools and instruments, and new structural and technological solutions have emerged. This often complicates the consideration of structural and technological features, leading to inaccuracies in organizational and technological modeling.
With the development of the domestic cost-estimating regulatory framework, scientific and technological advancements in the construction industry are increasingly taken into account. The parameters for labor intensity and machine intensity are gradually approaching real values, but this is not true for all construction processes.
Additionally, when considering only cost estimates, the exact values of labor intensity are often not critical—many companies benefit from higher estimates since a higher estimated cost is advantageous. However, inflated labor and machine intensity values lead to errors in work execution modeling. These errors quickly become apparent in practice, and for the construction of similar or repeated projects, companies establish internal standards or apply correction coefficients to existing regulations.
Thus, for common construction solutions, inaccuracies in the domestic regulatory framework are adjusted based on the experience of previous projects. However, for unique projects, such adjustments are difficult due to the lack of relevant experience. Therefore, for organizational and technological modeling of prefabricated-monolithic construction, it is recommended to use the latest regulatory standards from 2023 and, if necessary, conduct multi-variant modeling based on regulatory data from the past 40 years.
References
Iswahyudi B. E., Azis S., Santosa A.A. (2017) Analysis of Contruction Cost Efficiency Between Precast Method and Conventional Method in Building Project. International Journal of Technology and Sciences. 2017, Vol. 1(1). [URL: https://ejournal.itn.ac.id/index.php/ijts/article/view/62]. 2. Kazaz A., Manisali E., Ulubeyli S. (2008) Effect of basic motivational factors on construction workforce productivity in Turkey. Journal of civil engineering and management. 2008, Vol. 14(2). Рp. 95-106. [URL: https://www.Researchgate.net/publication/228673439_Effect_of_basic_motivational_factors_on_construction_workforce_productivity_in_Turkey]. 3. Kim J. Y., Abdelrazaq A. K. (2009) Construction Sequence Analysis of the Flat Plate System in A High-Rise Building and its Impact on the Constructioncycle. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2009, Vol.18 (Iss. 3). Рp. 341-349. DOI: 10.1002/tal.443. 4. Lei T., Wenhua T., Dongzhi G., Zixuan C. (2022) Experimental Study of Emulative Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections Locally Reinforced by U-Shaped UHPC Shells Materials. Special Issue Environmental Impact on Mechanical Properties of Construction Materials. 2022, 15(12), DOI:10.3390/ma15124066. 5. Mao C., Xie F. Y., Hou L., Wu P., Wang J., Wang X. Y. (2016) Cost analysis for sustainable off-site construction based on a multiple-case study in China. Habitat International. 2016, Vol.57. Рp. 215-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.002 [URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309251225 Cost_analysis_for_sustainable_off - site_construction_based_on_a_multiple-case_study_in_China].
Polat G. (2010) Precast concrete systems in developing vs. industrialized countries. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2010, V.16(1). Рp.85-94. DOI:10.3846/jcem.2010.08. 7. Sabah Shawkat, Chro Ali Hamaradha, Richard Schlesinger (2023) SURVEY OF PRECAST STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS. Conference: 4th International Conference on Architecture & Design (Proceedings of DARCH 2023 April 4th International Conference on Architecture & Design, 17-18 April, 2023), 2023. Рр.83-96 DOI:10.46529/darch.2023apr11. 8. Почапський, М. Д. Перспективи збірно-монолітного будівництва для відновлення об’єктів в Україні [Текст] / Почапський М. Д., Бутнік С. В., Помазан М. Д. // Будівельне виробництво - 2023. - №74. - С. 35-41. 9. MOLODID, O. S.; SHANDRA, O. H. Методи нормування процесів зведення монолітних будівельних конструкцій.
ТОНКАЧЕЄВ, Г.М. Нова система нормування витрат часу для прийняття технологічних рішень. [Текст] / Г.М. ТОНКАЧЕЄВ // Містобудування та територіальне планування. – 2013. - №50. - С. 700-704.
Тонкачеєв, Г. М. Відбір опалубних систем для влаштування монолітних колон за методикою цілочислового нормування трудомісткості та тривалості процесів [Текст] / Г. М. Тонкачеєв, В.Г. Тонкачеєв, К. Носач // Шляхи підвищення ефективності будівництва. - 2021. - №47(1). - С. 96-107
Лепська Л., Тонкачеєв Г., Шандра О. ПІДВИЩЕННЯ ТЕХНОЛОГІЧНОСТІ МОНТАЖУ КАРКАСНИХ БУДІВЕЛЬ: ПЕРЕДОВІ МЕТОДИ [Текст] / Л. Лепська, Г. Тонкачеєв, О. Шандра. // Містобудування та територіальне планування. - 2024. - №85.- С. 315-339.
Тонкачеєв, Г.М. Дослідження трудомісткості і тривалості процесів монтажу структурних блоків покриття [Текст] / Г.М. Тонкачеєв, В.П. Рашківський, I.M. Руднєва, І.В. Дубовик // Науково-технічний збірник Київського університету будівництва та архітектури. - 2021. - №110. – С. 393-403
Тонкачеєв, Г.М. Особливості формування нормативного часу на виконання будівельних процесів: тематичне дослідження [Текст] / Г.М. Тонкачеєв, I.М. Руднєва, В.Г. Тонкачеєв, Ю.М. Прядко // Науково-технічний збірник Київського університету будівництва та архітектури. - 2022. - №109. - С. 141-151.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
