ANALYSIS OF THE BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A FRANCIS TURBINE MODERNIZED WITH A MODULAR GUIDE VANE

Authors

  • O. Palchenko Харківський національний університет міського господарства імені О.М. Бекетова

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-1-189-345-351

Keywords:

hydropower turbine, modular guide vane, Sensor Fish

Abstract

There are two strategies to reduce the overall project costs to a level that would make many potential sustainable hydropower projects economically viable:
1. Designing standard/modular components.

2. Utilizing advanced tools to reduce the costs of environmental assessment.
Several studies have been conducted at various hydropower plants using an autonomous sensor device (Sensor Fish) to examine a Francis turbine modernized with a modular guide vane. A series of average minimum pressures were measured under different operating conditions during the experiments. These values were compared with data obtained for other Francis turbines installed at different hydropower plants using Sensor Fish. The experimental data from multiple hydropower plants fell within the same range, emphasizing their reliability.
Additionally, the tests demonstrated that the modular guide vane installed in the modernized Francis turbine is a potentially suitable replacement. It can provide biological characteristics comparable to those of guide vanes used in other Francis turbines, while also offering the advantage of reduced manufacturing costs.
Hydropower is the largest renewable energy source in the world, with an installed capacity of 1,114 GW as of the end of 2017, accounting for more than 50% of all renewable energy globally.
In Europe, traditional hydropower makes up about 59% of renewable energy, while in the United States (USA), it accounts for more than 50%. In Ukraine, hydropower represents 8% of the total capacity of the country's unified energy system, with an average annual electricity generation by hydropower plants of 10.8 billion kWh.
Despite the fact that traditional hydropower remains the largest renewable energy source, its growth rate is lower compared to other renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power.
While new large hydropower plants were being constructed in South America and Asia, North America and Europe primarily focused on small hydropower plants (SHPs).
The expansion of SHP usage will require research and development of new innovative technologies and design approaches to make them economically viable and ensure their sustainable implementation. One way to achieve this goal is the development of standardized and modular components based on the "plug-and-play" principle.
Such standardized and modular components will help reduce overall project costs compared to traditional custom-designed structures adapted to specific sites. This approach will make many low-head hydropower projects, which were previously unprofitable, economically feasible.

References

Sawin JL, Rutovitz J, Sverrisson F. Renewables 2018: Global status report; 2018.

Mennel T, Ziegler H, Ebert M, Nybø A, Oberrauch F, Hewicker C. The hydropower sector's contribution to a sustainable and prosperous Europe. Main report. DNV-GL, on behalf of: A European hydropower Initiative of hydropower companies and supported by associations, Bonn, Germany; 2015.

(USDOE) U.S. Department of Energy. Hydropower Vision.

URL: https://www.energy.gov/eere/water/new-vision-united-states- hydropower (дата звернення: 03.02.2025).

ПРАТ «Укргідроенерго»

URL: https://uhe.gov.ua/ (дата звернення: 03.02.2025).

Fearnside PM. Dams in the Amazon: Belo Monte and Brazil’s hydroelectric development of the Xingu River Basin. Environ Manage 2006;38(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0113-6

Fan Q, Zhou S, Yang N. Optimization design of foundation excavation for Xiluodu super-high arch dam in China. J Rock Mech Geo Eng 2015;7(2):120–35.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.001

Zhou D, Deng ZD. Ultra-low-head hydroelectric technology: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;78:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.086

Witt A, Smith BT, Tsakiris A, Papanicolaou T, Lee K, Stewart KM. Exemplary design envelope specification for standard modular hydropower technology; 2017.

Choi HJ, Zullah MA, Roh HW, Ha PS, Oh SY, Lee YH. CFD validation of performance improvement of a 500 kW Francis turbine. Renew Energ 2013;54:111–23.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.049

Yang W, Wu Y, Liu S. An optimization method on runner blades in bulb turbine based on CFD analysis. Sci China: Technol Sci 2011;54(2):338–44.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-4261-4

Zidonis A, Aggidis GA. State of the art in numerical modelling of Pelton turbines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;45:135–44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.037

Williamson SJ, Stark BH, Booker JD. Performance of a low-head pico-hydro Turgo turbine. Appl Energy 2013;102:1114–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.029

Sammartano V, Aricò C, Carravetta A, Fecarotta O, Tucciarelli T. Banki-Michell optimal design by computational fluid dynamics testing and hydrodynamic analysis. Energies 2013;6(5):2362–85.

https://doi.org/10.3390/en6052362

Lisicki Michal, Lubitz William, Taylor Graham W. Optimal design and operation of Archimedes screw turbines using Bayesian optimization. Appl Energy 2016;183:1404–17.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.084

Schneider AD. Natel Energy Inc. Linear Pelton turbine. U.S. Patent Application 10/ 221,830; 2019.

Chen J, Engeda A. Standard module hydraulic technology: A novel geometrical design methodology and analysis for a low-head hydraulic turbine system, Part I: General design methodology and basic geometry considerations. Energy 2020;196:117151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117151

Obermeyer HK. OBERMEYER HYDRO Inc. Water control gate and actuator therefore. U.S. Patent 7,114,879; 2006.

Cada GF. The development of advanced hydroelectric turbines to improve fish passage survival. Fisheries 2001;26(9):14–23.

https://doi.org/10.2172/1218168

Deng ZD, Lu J, Myjak MJ, Martinez JJ, Tian C, Morris SJ, et al. Design and implementation of a new autonomous Sensor Fish to support advanced hydropower development. Rev Sci Instrum 2014;85(11):115001.

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4900543

Brown RS, Carlson TJ, Gingerich AJ, Stephenson JR, Pflugrath BD, Welch AE, et al. Quantifying mortal injury of juvenile Chinook salmon exposed to simulated hydroturbine passage. Trans Am Fish Soc 2012;141(1):147–57.

https://www.doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2011.650274

Stephenson JR, Gingerich AJ, Brown RS, Pflugrath BD, Deng Z, Carlson TJ, et al. Assessing barotrauma in neutrally and negatively buoyant juvenile salmonids exposed to simulated hydro-turbine passage using a mobile aquatic barotrauma laboratory. Fish Res 2010;106(3):271–8.

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.08.006

Richmond MC, Deng Z, McKinstry CA, Mueller RP, Carlson TJ, Dauble DD.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f05-091

Response relationships between juvenile salmon and an autonomous sensor in turbulent flow. Fish Res 2009;97(1–2):134–9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.01.011

Fu T, Deng ZD, Duncan JP, Zhou D, Carlson TJ, Johnson GE, et al. Assessing hydraulic conditions through Francis turbines using an autonomous sensor device. Renew Energ 2016;99:1244–52.

https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.08.029

Martinez JJ, Deng ZD, Klopries EM, Mueller RP, Titzler PS, Zhou D, et al. Characterization of a siphon turbine to accelerate low-head hydropower deployment. J Clean Prod 2019;210:35–42.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.345

Martinez J, Deng ZD, Tian C, Mueller R, Phonekhampheng O, Singhanouvong D, et al. In situ characterization of turbine hydraulic environment to support development of fish-friendly hydropower guidelines in the lower Mekong River region. Ecol Eng 2019;133:88–97.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.04.028

Neitzel DA, Dauble DD, Cada GF, Richmond MC, Guensch GR, Mueller RP, et al. Survival estimates for juvenile fish subjected to a laboratory-generated shear environment. Trans Am Fish Soc 2004;133(2):447–54.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.019

Bevelhimer MS, Pracheil BM, Fortner AM, Saylor R, Deck KL. Mortality and Injury Assessment for Three Species of Fish Exposed to Simulated Turbine Blade Strike. Can J Fish Aquat Sci [Published online 2019.

https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2018-0386].

Published

2025-04-02

How to Cite

Palchenko, O. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF A FRANCIS TURBINE MODERNIZED WITH A MODULAR GUIDE VANE. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1(189), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2025-1-189-345-351

Issue

Section

статьи