DETERMINATION OF STEAKHOLDERS IN THE SYSTEM OF LAND RELATIONS OF CITIES
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to determine the stakeholders in the system of land relations of cities, taking into account the directions and features of urban development.
As a result of the research, the theoretical provisions on the definition of stakeholders are systematized.
The definition of stakeholders interacting in the system of land relations of cities to ensure urban development.
Approaches to the definition of stakeholders are defined: management, information, functional, target, approach, which takes into account the peculiarities of the relations between groups of stakeholders, combined, integrated.
The author's definition of stakeholders interacting in the system of urban land relations and providing urban development is proposed, which are characterized as groups of stakeholders that affect the functioning and management of the subjects of land relations, take into account the normative, legal, spatial, analytical, infrastructural support and features of transformations in the economic, social , Environmental spheres to achieve the objectives of urban development through the implementation of long-term Directions of land use and the potential of cities, the exchange of information flows.
Keywords: stakeholders, urban development, land relations of cities.
References
Література
Googins, B. Beyond Good Company. Next Generation Corporate Citizenship / B. Googins, P. H. Mirvis, S. A. Rochlin – Boston: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. – 288 p.
Мамонов, К. А. Стейкхолдери в системі вартісно-орієнтованого управління капіталом бренду будівельних компаній [Текст] // Економіка і регіон: Науковий вісник Полтавського національного університету імені Юрія Кондратюка. – 2011. - №30-С (спеціальний випуск). - С. 256 – 261.
Палеха, Ю. Н. Применение ГИС-технологий в градостроительных проектах на государственном и региональном уровнях [Текст] // Ученые записки Таврического национального университета им. В.И.Вернадского. География. - 2012. - 25 (64). №1 – С. 155-166.
Freeman, R. E. Stakeholder Theory. The state of the art. [Електронний ресурс] / R. E. Freeman, J. S. Harrison, A. C. Wicks, B. L. Parmar, S. de Colle. - Режим доступу: http://books.google.com.
Основные принципы геоинформационных систем: учебн. Пособие [Текст] / Шипулин В. Д.; Харьк. нац. акад. гор. хоз-ва. – Х.: ХНАГХ, 2010. – 337 с.
Jensen, M.C. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure // Journal of Financial Economics. - 1976. - № 3. - РР. 305 - 360.
Hill, C. Stakeholder-Agency Theory // Journal of Management Studies. - 1992. - № 2. РР. 131 - 154.
Goodijk, R. Corporate governance and stakeholder management // The ING. CORPORATE OWNERSHIP & CONTROL. – 2003. - Volume 1, Issue 1. - PP. 159-167.
Клилэнд, Д. Управление заинтересованными сторонами в проекте / Д. Клилэнд // Управление проектами. – М.: Питер, 2004. – 463 с.
Потрашкова, Л. В. Влияние партнерских отношений на потенциал предприятия // Механизм регулювання економіки. – 2008. - № 4. Т. 1. – С. 188 – 193.
Мартинюк, М. Ринок землі в Україні: три можливі моделі запуску та їх наслідки. [Електронний ресурс] / М. Мартинюк. – Режим доступу:
References
Googins, B., Mirvis, P. H., Rochlin, Beyond S. A. (2008). Good Company. Next Generation Corporate Citizenship Palgrave Macmillan, 288.
Mamonov, K. A. (2011). Stakeholders system of value-oriented brand management of capital construction companies. Business and Location: Scientific Bulletin of Poltava National University Yuri Kondratyuk. №30-C (special edition). 256, 261.
Palekha, Y. N., Oleshchenko, A. V., Solomaha, I. V. (2012). Application of GIS technology in urban development projects at the national and regional levels. Scientific notes of Taurida National University. Vernadsky. Geography, 1. 155-166.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., de Colle, S. Stakeholder Theory. The state of the art. www.books.google.com. Retrieved from http://books.google.com.
Shipulin, V. D. (2010) Basic Principles of Geographic Information Systems. O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv. 337.
Jensen, M. C. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics. № 3. 305 - 360.
Hill, C. (1992). Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies. № 2. 131 - 154.
Goodijk, R. (2003). Corporate governance and stakeholder management. The ING. CORPORATE OWNERSHIP&CONTROL. № 1. 159 - 167.
Kliland, D. (2004). Managing Stakeholders in the Project. Peter. 463.
Potrashkova, L. V. (2008). Influence of partner relations on enterprise. Mechanism of regular economy. № 4, T. 1. 188 – 193.
Martyniuk, М. Land market in Ukraine: Three possible models and their implications launch. www.kirovohradska.land.gov.ua/rynok-zemli-v-ukraini-try-mozhlyvi-modeli-zapusku-ta-ikh-naslidky-stattia-maksyma-martyniuka-u-hazeti-dzerkalo-tyzhnia/. Retrieved from
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
