RECOVERY PROSPECTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORIES

Authors

  • N. Denysenko Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-5-179-2-8

Keywords:

economic recovery of the territories, relocation of enterprises, recovery plan, prospective directions of investment

Abstract

The main goal of state and local development policies should be the creation of an economic system able to generate a sufficient amount of resources in the long term.

The war lead to the destruction of critical infrastructure in many regions, material losses, millions of forced displacements, and demographic shifts. Traditional challenges of local governance and development in Ukraine have been augmented by new complications. In the course of the study, modern challenges for localities were analyzed and summarized.

The concept of "affected territories" is proposed to be introduced into the normative regulation meaning territories or their parts that suffered from the conduct of hostilities or missile-bomb/artillery attacks. In order to make effective management decisions regarding the possibility of restoring such territories, it is necessary to develop a certain classification based on the degree of destruction and population loss (including due to evacuation/migration) and create a map of such territories.

The restoration of Ukraine is the restoration of fully-fledged life in cities and villages and the formation of a new economy while taking into account new realities. The local private sector is the engine of economic activity and growth of the territory. Therefore, supporting entrepreneurship and smart investment in the development of small and medium-sized businesses must be a vital component of any recovery strategy.

The article examines groups of enterprises that continued to work and develop during the war. Additional threats and risks of enterprise operation are summarized, and losses are grouped. “Losses from war” are understood as the value expression of the result of a change in the condition of objects due to a violation of their integrity or deterioration of their properties, and an increase in actual or possible socio-economic and other losses that occur during the war.

It is substantiated in the research that the immediate factors in the process of restoration of territories should be working with investors, creating a favorable business environment and supporting entrepreneurial initiatives. Prospective areas of investment are summarized, taking into account modern changes in market needs.

Author Biography

N. Denysenko, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

PhD (Econom.), Associate Professor at the Department of Urban Economy

References

Kindzersky, Yu (2002). Post-war restoration of the industry of Ukraine: challenges and peculiarities of the policy Economic analysis, 2, 101–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.35774/econa2022.02.101

Zveryakov, M. (2022). Formation of the model of economic development in new historical realities. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.08.003

Shapran, O. (2022). Marketing justification of measures to stabilize the economic system of Ukraine in the post-war period based on the sharing economy Bulletin of the National Technical University, 1, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.20998/2519-4461.2022.1.3

Denysenko, N.(2023). Financial stability in the conditions of war and post-war recovery of the economy of Ukraine. Collection of Scientific Papers SCIENTIA, 17–20. Retrieved from:https://previous.scientia.report/index.php/archive/article/view/673

Mamedov, A. & Denysenko, N. (2023). Economic consequences and problems of post-war territorial reconstruction. Urban planning and territorial planning, 82, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.32347/2076-815x.2023.82.220-231

Ivanov, S. (2019). Economic recovery and development of countries after armed conflicts and wars: unmissable opportunities for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 1, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2019.01.075

Sharov, O. (2015). Lessons and prospects of the "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 4, 12–18. Retrieved from http://economyukr.org.ua/?page_id=723&lang=uk&aid=553

Humenyuk, V. (2022). Foreign experience of post-war transformation of public administration and lessons for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 8, 34–54. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2022.08.034

Frankel, Jeffrey A. & David, Romer (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? American Economic review, 89, 379–399. Retrieved from https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/aer.89.3.379

De Loecker, Jan (2013). Detecting Learning by Exporting, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5, 1–21. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w16548/w16548.pdf

Hausman, Ricardo Hausmann, Hwang, Jason, & Dani Rodrik (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 1–25. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w11905/w11905.pdf

Horodnichenko, Y, Sologub, I. & Veder di Mauro B. (2022). Reconstruction of Ukraine: principles and politics. Center for economic policy research, Retrieved from https://cepr.org/system/files/2022-12/reconstruction%20book_Ukrainian_0.pdf

Stewart, F. & Fitzgerald, V. (2001). Introduction; Assessing the Economic Costs of War' in War and Underdevelopment. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Retrieved from https://gsdrc.org/document-library/assessing-the-economic-costs-of-war/

Glanz, J. (2009, March 1). The Economic Cost of War. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/01/weekinreview/01glanz.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

Ivanov, S. (2015). The influence of armed conflict (war, hostilities) on the cost of the enterprise: monograp. Dnipropetrovsk. 179.

Business support in wartime: practical recommendations for communities. (2023). "U-LEAD with Europe" program. Retrieved from https://bc-club.org.ua/bc-club/business_support_tools_2022.html

Published

2023-09-04

How to Cite

Denysenko, N. (2023). RECOVERY PROSPECTS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORIES. Municipal Economy of Cities, 5(179), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-5-179-2-8