CAVITATION EROSION IN FRANCIS TURBINES

Authors

  • O. Palchenko O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-4-185-141-146

Keywords:

hydroelectric turbine, cavitation erosion, computational fluid dynamics

Abstract

The phenomenon of secondary flow is a global problem that causes cavitation erosion in hydraulic equipment. Cavitation is a phenomenon of localised corrosion of the metal surface leading to instability and highly uneven flow behaviour with a consequent excessive noise, vibration, and decreased efficiency in Francis, Kaplan, and other turbines. Both Kaplan and Francis turbines are reaction turbines. Francis turbines (FT) are used worldwide due to their relatively compact design, high efficiency, and operation underwater at heights ranging from 100 to 300 m with an efficiency ranging from 90% to 95%.

The article analyses the latest relevant research conducted by various researchers on different turbine components. The analysis shows that this type of erosion depends on flow characteristics, surface, and properties of the material eroding. Tools for design optimisation, cavitation erosion, and well-conducted experiments will provide results for identifying and reducing erosion. Although some researchers conducted experimental work to study the effect of cavitation erosion, literature on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is very scarce. Over the past two decades, experts have been applying CFD methods to detect cavitation by examining areas where the pressure is below the vapour pressure with a single-phase model. Most studies do not consider the impact of cavitation bubbles on the flow field. However, these methods cannot provide detailed information, such as the impact of cavitation on efficiency or a more accurate prediction of the cavitation bubble size.

Some researchers use cavitation inducers and some of the latest visualisation methods as experimental tools to study cavitation phenomena. In the last decade, a numerical methodology has been widely used in research and experiments, yielding significant results.

Studying cavitation erosion in hydroelectric turbine systems presents a complex challenge for future research. Many parameters and features still require further investigation. All the discussed studies have established that cavitation phenomena require state-of-the-art equipment for their detection and visualisation. Moreover, more work is necessary for the numerical assessment of cavitation.

Author Biography

O. Palchenko, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Geotechnics, Underground Structures and Hydraulic Engineering

References

Jia J. A Technical Review of Hydro-Project Development in China // Engineering 2016, vol. 2, P. 302–312. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.03.008

Knapp, R. Cavitation / R. Knapey, J. Daly, F. Hammit. M.: Mir, 1974. 688 p.

Sribnyuk, S.M. The connection between vacuum and the phenomena of cavitation / S.M. Sribnyuk, L.L. Zubricheva, // Scientific journal of everyday life: zb. Sci. etc. / Academician future of Ukraine. – Kh.: HDTUBA, 2010 – vol. 59. – Р. 293–297.

Goyal R., Gandhi B.K. Review of hydrodynamics instabilities in Francis turbine during off-design and transient operations // Renew: Energy 2018, vol. 116, P. 697–709. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.012

Tomaz R. An Investigation of the Relationship between Acoustic Emission, Vibration, Noise and Cavitation Structures on a Kaplan Turbine // J. Fluids Eng. 2007, vol. 129, P. 1112–1122.

Chitrakar S., Singh B., Gunnar O., Prasad H. Numerical and experimental study of the leakage flow in guide vanes with different hydrofoils // J. Comput. Des. Eng. 2017, vol. 4, P. 218–230. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2017.02.004

Ghiban B., Safta C.-A., Ion M., Crângas, C.E., Grecu M.-C. Structural Aspects of Silt Erosion Resistant Materials Used in Hydraulic Machines Manufacturing // Energy Procedia 2017, vol. 112, P. 75–82. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1064

Amarendra H.J., Chaudhari G.P., Nath S.K. Synergy of cavitation and slurry erosion in the slurry pot tester // Wear 2012, vol. 290–291, P. 25–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.05.025

Haosheng C., Jiadao W., Darong C. Cavitation damages on solid surfaces in suspensions containing spherical and irregular microparticles // Wear 2008, vol. 126, P. 1–4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.05.010

Franc J.-P., Riondet M., Karimi A., Chahine G.L. Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting // Wear 2012, vol. 274-275, P. 248–259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.09.006

Pereira J.G., Andolfatto L., Avellan F. Monitoring a Fran-cis turbine operating conditions // Flow Meas: Instrum. 2018, vol. 63, P. 37–46.

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2018.07.007

Gohil P., Saini R. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee Numerical Study of Cavitation in Francis Turbine of a Small Hydro Power Plant // J. Appl: Fluid Mech. 2016, vol. 9, P. 357–365.

Sreedhar B., Albert S., Pandit A. Cavitation damage: Theory and measurements – A review // Wear 2017, vol. 372–373, P. 177–196. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.12.009

Iliescu M.S., Ciocan G.D., Avellan F. Analysis of the Cavitating Draft Tube Vortex in a Francis Turbine Using Particle Image Velocimetry Measurements in Two-Phase Flow // J. Fluids Eng. 2008, vol. 130, P. 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1115/1.2813052

Arispe T.M., Oliveira W., Ramirez R.G. Francis turbine draft tube parameterization and analysis of performance characteristics using CFD techniques // Renew: Energy 2018, vol. 127, P. 114–124. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.055

Mohanta R.K., Chelliah T.R., Allamsetty S., Akula A., Ghosh R. Sources of vibration and their treatment in hydro power stations – A Review // Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2017, vol. 20, P. 637–648. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.11.004

Kang Z., Feng C., Liu Z., Cang Y., Gao S. Analysis of the incipient cavitation noise signal characteristics of hydroturbine // Appl. Acoust. 2017, vol. 127, P. 118–125. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.029

Zhang Y., Liu K., Xian H., Du X. A review of methods for vortex identification in hydroturbines // Renew: Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, vol. 81, P. 1269–1285. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.058

Kc A., Thapa B., Lee Y. Transient numerical analysis of rotor e stator interaction in a Francis turbine // Renew: Energy 2014, vol. 65, P. 227–235. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.013

Celebioglu K., Altintas B., Aradag S., Tascioglu Y. Nu-merical research of cavitation on Francis turbine runners // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, vol. 43, P. 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.180

Trivedi C., Dahlhaug O. A Comprehensive Review of Verification and Validation Techniques Applied to Hydraulic Turbines // Int. J. Fluid Mach. Syst. 2019, vol. 12, P. 345–367. http://doi.org/10.5293/IJFMS.2019.12.4.345

Noon A.A., Kim M.-H. Sediment and Cavitation Erosion in Francis Turbines – Review of Latest Experimental and Numerical Techniques // Energies 2021, vol. 14, P. 1516. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061516

Published

2024-09-06

How to Cite

Palchenko, O. (2024). CAVITATION EROSION IN FRANCIS TURBINES. Municipal Economy of Cities, 4(185), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-4-185-141-146