PECULIARITIES OF BUSIN ESS REPUTATION ASSESSMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY COMPANIES
The issues of formation and evaluation of the business reputation of the enterprise have been updated. Existing methods and approaches to assessing the level of business reputation of companies, their advantages and disadvantages are analyzed and systematized. The problems of estimation of business reputation of water supply companies are covered. It is determined that the assessment should be made taking into account the specificity of activity and sectoral affiliation of enterprises, as well as their form of ownership. The necessity to develop a methodology for assessing the level of goodwill on the basis of calculating the integrated indicators of the level of stakeholders' interaction of water supply companies. An analysis of existing approaches to assessing goodwill has shown that each group of methods, both quantitative and qualitative, has certain advantages and disadvantages. The most appropriate methods for assessing goodwill, such as: assessing goodwill as an excess of market value over the value of its net assets; estimation by the excess profit method; Brand Finance Appraisal; evaluation using a multiplier; method of options; expert method, were identified. The use of qualitative approaches to the assessment of the goodwill of the water supply companies was justified. Using quality methods, you can manage business reputation and measure in which direction it will change over time. It is noted that the implementation of goodwill assessment is complicated by the diversity of interests of both individual groups, and interests within an individual stakeholder group. It is determined that the level of stakeholder interaction is a set of integrated indicators of interaction of each of the stakeholder groups on the basis of which the goodwill and measures taken to form and implement its management strategy are assessed . It is proposed to assess the level of business reputation of water supply companies based on the method of expert evaluation using the integrated indicator of the level of engagement.
Dauling, G. (2003) Reputaciya firmy: sozdanie, upravleniya i ocenka effektivnosti. per. s angl. Moskva: Konsaltingovaya gruppa «IMIDZh-Kontakt»: INFRA-M.,. 367 s. Istoriya antichnoj filosofii / S.V. Proleev . – Moskva : Refl-buk ; Kiyiv : Vakler, 2001 . – 510 s.
Shepel, V. M. (2002) Imidzhelogiya. Kak nravitsya lyudyam. Moskva: Narodnoe obrazovanie, 500. Vasilyev O. V. Formuvannya sistemi upravlinnya ekonomichnoyu bezpekoyu promislovih pidpriyemstv / O. V. Vasilyev, V. I. Mejta // Ekonomichnij analiz. – 2013. – Tom 14, № 2. – S. 138-145.
Gorin, S. V., Tinkov, S. V. (2007) Potencial delovoj reputacii malyh predpriyatij razlichnyh organizacionno-pravovyh form. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 7, 67–75. Rudkovskij O. V. Struktura sistemi ekonomichnoyi bezpeki pidpriyemstva. – 2014. – №29 (2). – S. 93 99.
Grebeshkova, A. M., Shimanskaya, A. V (2007) Delovaya reputaciya kak strategicheskij aktiv kompanii. Strategiya razvitiya Ukrainy (ekonomika, sociologiya, pravo), 1–2, 493–502. Ekonomichna bezpeka korporativnogo pidpriyemstva : [navch. posib.] / M. A. Kovalenko, I. I. Nagorna, N. V. Radvanska ta in. – Herson: Oldi-plyus, 2009. – 403 s.
Lyashenko, O. M. (2013) Ekonomichni interesi stejkholderiv pidpriyemstva: dialektichna vzayemodiya, sistematizaciya, vibir sposobiv uzgodzhennya. Visnik TNEU, 2, 54-61.
Bondar, M. I. (2010) Viznannya gudvilu pri pridbanni pidpriyemstva z metoyu jogo vidobrazhennya v obliku. Formuvannya rinkovoyi ekonomiki, 21, 528−536.7.
Dmitruk, Ye. V. (2009) Mozhlivosti vikoristannya modeli vplivu reputaciyi pidpriyemstva na riven jogo ekonomichnoyi bezpeki. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnictva, 4, 152–159.
Zobkova, Zh. O., Pahomov, A. V., Pahomova, E. A. (2015) Kompleksnyj podhod k ocenke delovoj reputacii predpriyatiya. Retrieved from http://www.mce.su/archive/doc21860/
Byelikov, O. Gudvil, yak skladova chastina nematerialnih aktiviv. (2014) Retrieved from http://www.justinian.com.ua/article.php?id=3217
Golov, S. F., Kostyuchenko, V. M. (2007) Buhgalterskij oblik i finansova zvitnist za mizhnarodnimi standartami. Harkiv: Faktor, 976.
Polozhennya (standart) buhgalterskogo obliku 19 «Ob'yednannya pidpriyemstv»: Nakaz Ministerstva finansiv Ukrayini № 163 vid 7 lipnya 1999 r., zi zminami i dop. Retrieved from: http://www.nibu.factor.ua/ukr/info/instrbuh/psbu19 (data zvernennya: 12.10.2015 r.).
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).