ON THE ISSUE OF ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DESIGN SOLUTIONS TO ENSURE THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2024-6-187-313-318Keywords:
urban transport system, sustainable development, transport demand management, private car, fuel typeAbstract
Modern transport problems in many cities around the world are caused by the high level of motorisation of their population and the high frequency of private car use. Despite a number of advantages of using private cars as a means of transport (high speed of communication, the ability to choose a route and travel at a convenient time, high comfort, etc.), the mismatch between the development of motorisation and the existing transport infrastructure leads to traffic congestion, which has a number of negative consequences that make the use of private cars less efficient. These consequences include increased transport delays, reduced traffic speeds and, consequently, increased travel time, and more intensive consumption of non-renewable energy sources. Equally urgent are the issues of road safety and improving the environmental situation in cities. At present, a promising way to solve urban transport problems is to apply the concept of sustainable development of urban transport systems and the methodology of transport demand management.
The justification of design solutions to ensure the sustainability of urban transport systems should be based on a model approach and include a comprehensive assessment of a number of social, economic and environmental performance indicators. The adequacy of transport models and the accuracy of the assessment of the consequences of design decisions are crucial for choosing the most appropriate set of measures to ensure the sustainability of transport systems.
The article proposes an efficiency criterion for evaluating design solutions to ensure the sustainability of the city's transport system, which contribute to reducing the use of private car. This criterion provides for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of design solutions in terms of economic, social and environmental performance indicators.
Based on the analysis of statistical data, it was found that the following distribution of passenger cars by type of fuel consumed is typical for Kharkiv: cars with petrol engines - 48.58%; diesel cars - 14.63%; cars with gas cylinder equipment - 33.58%; electric cars - 3.21%. The established distribution of passenger cars by type of fuel consumed is the basis for establishing average values of variable and fixed operating costs of private car owners and should be taken into account when assessing the environmental impact of the transport process. This is the direction of further research.
References
Hrelja, R., Rye, T. (2023). Decreasing the share of travel by car. Strategies for implementing ‘push’or ‘pull’measures in a traditionally car-centric transport and land use planning. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(5), 446-458.
Miner, P., M. Smith, B., Jani, A., McNeill, G., Gathorne-Hardy, A. (2024). Car harm: A global review of automobility’s harm to people and the environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 115, 103817, 1-17.
Saeidizand, P., Fransen, K., Boussauw, K. (2022). Revisiting car dependency: A worldwide analysis of car travel in global metropolitan areas. Cities, 120, 1-33.
Eurostat. Access mode: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240117-1
Janic, M. (2006). Sustainable transport in the European Union: A review of the past research and future ideas. Transport Reviews, 26(1), 81-104.
Rassafi, A. A., Vaziri, M. (2005). Sustainable transport indicators: definition and integration. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2, 83-96.
Gudmundsson, H., Höjer, M. (1996). Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological economics, 19(3), 269-282.
Aytekin, A., Korucuk, S., Görçün, Ö. F. (2024). Determining the factors affecting transportation demand management and selecting the best strategy: A case study. Transport policy, 146, 150-166.
Qin, X., Ke, J., Wang, X., Tang, Y., Yang, H. (2022). Demand management for smart transportation: A review. Multimodal Transportation, 1(4), 1-15.
Beria, P., Maltese, I., Mariotti, I. (2012). Multicriteria versus Cost Benefit Analysis: a comparative perspective in the assessment of sustainable mobility. European Transport Research Review, 4, 137-152.
Open data portal. Information about vehicles and their owners. Access mode: https://data.gov.ua/dataset/06779371-308f-42d7-895e-5a39833375f0
Ministry of Finance. Fuel prices at gas stations in Ukraine. Access mode: https://index.minfin.com.ua/ua/markets/fuel/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors who publish in this collection agree with the following terms:
• The authors reserve the right to authorship of their work and give the magazine the right to first publish this work under the terms of license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (with the Designation of Authorship - Non-Commercial - Without Derivatives 4.0 International), which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this magazine.
• Authors have the right to make independent extra-exclusive work agreements in the form in which they were published by this magazine (for example, posting work in an electronic repository of an institution or publishing as part of a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained. .
• Journal policy allows and encourages the publication of manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutions' repositories or on personal websites), both before the publication of this manuscript and during its editorial work, as it contributes to the emergence of productive scientific discussion and positively affects the efficiency and dynamics of the citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).