ANALYSIS OF MODERN METHODS AND TOOLS FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT

Authors

  • A. Batrakova Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
  • S. Urdzik Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
  • D. Batrakov V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2022-3-170-134-142

Keywords:

hidden cracks, diagnostics, ground penetrating radar, flexible pavement.

Abstract

Solving the problem of increasing the durability of pavement requires establishing a level of permissible defectiveness that takes into account insecure hidden damage, such as hidden cracks. A detailed study of hidden cracks became possible with the development of means and methods for non-destructive testing of pavement, but their diversity greatly complicates the procedure for choosing the optimal methods and technical means for solving problems of pavement diagnostics. Therefore, the article analyzes the potential and scope of instrumental methods for diagnosing non-rigid pavement for solving problems of assessing the state of non-rigid pavement with cracks in layers of monolithic materials, and substantiates the most promising methods and tools for positioning and identifying cracks in pavement layers. The conducted studies allow: to substantiate the requirements for equipment for solving the problems of flaw detection of flat-layered media, in particular, non-rigid pavement; develop a procedure for diagnosing non-rigid pavement; to develop methods for interpreting diagnostic results to solve the problems of finding, positioning and identifying cracks in layers of non-rigid pavement. The conducted studies have proved that GPRs have the greatest potential for solving the problem of non-rigid pavement flaw detection. The advantages of GPR sounding for solving this class of problems are ensured by the continuity of data collection, the best resolution relative to other geophysical methods, high shooting speed, and the possibility of using it in a wide range of road construction materials. It can also be stated that there is considerable experience in the use of GPR for searching, positioning and identifying through cracks in layers of non-rigid pavement, while research on finding, positioning and identifying hidden cracks is very limited. Therefore, further research should be aimed at solving the following problems: improving methods for restoring the dielectric constant in multilayer structures, which will improve the reliability of GPR data interpretation results and the efficiency of diagnostics; development of methods for recording and analyzing the polarization state of the signal reflected from cracks, which creates a theoretical foundation for flaw detection of pavements and expands the possibilities of GPR diagnostics; substantiation of the type of antenna units, which will improve the accuracy of measurements. The solution of these problems will allow assessing the state of non-rigid pavement with cracks, based on information about the geometric and structural heterogeneity of the layers of the structure, obtained from the results of GPR sounding.

Author Biographies

A. Batrakova, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

Doctor of Engineering, Professor, Professor of the Department

S. Urdzik, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

PhD, Associate Professor of the Department

D. Batrakov, V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department

References

Gasanov, S.G. (2013). Solution of the problem of mechanics of destruction of the road surface, taking into account defects such as cracks. Mechanics of machines, mechanisms and materials, 2(23), 35–40. [in Russian]

Leonovich, I.I., Bogdonivich, S.V, Nesterovich, I.V. (2011). Road diagnostics. Minsk, New Knowledge. [in Russian]

Zakeri, H., Nejad, F.M., Fahimifar, A., Torshizi, A.D., Zarandi, M.H.F. (2013). A multi-stage expert system for classification of pavement cracking. In: IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608558

Abdullah, R., Zulhaidi, H., Shafri, M., Mardeni, R., Sabira, Khatun. (2009). Evaluation of Road Pavement Density Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2, 100–111. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jest.2009.100.111

Zakeri, H., Fereidoon Moghadas Nejad, Ahmad Fahimifar. (2016). Image based techniques for crack detection, classification and quantification in asphalt pavement. A review. Springer, Barcelona, Spain.

Staniek, M. (2017). Detection of cracks in asphalt pavement during road inspection processes. Scientific Journal of Silesian University of Technology, Series Transport, 96, 175–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.96.16

Sachi, K., Holleran, I., Glynn, E. (2016). Characterising bitumen binders for pavements in the Auckland region. Road & Transport Research. A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 25(4), 27–38.

Xu, G., Chen, F., Wu, G. (2018). Active solution of homography for pavement crack recovery with four laser lines. Sci Rep, 8.

Bitelli, G., Simone, A., Girardi, F., Lantiery, C. (2012). Laser Scanning on Road Pavements. A New Approach for Characterizing Surface Texture. Sensors (Basel), 12, 9110–9128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s120709110

Deng, Y., Yang, Q. (2019). Rapid evaluation of a transverse crack on a semi-rigid pavement utilizing deflection basin data. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20(4), 929–942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1424026

Weiguang, Zhang, Muhammad, Arfan Akber, Shuguang, Hou, Jiang, Bian, Dong, Zhang, Qiqi, Le. (2019). Detection of dynamic modulus and crack properties of asphalt pavement using a non-destructive ultrasonic wave method appl. Sci Rep, 9(15), 2946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9152946

Weil, G.J., Haefner, L.E. (1989). Toward an integrated nondestructive pavement testing management information system using infrared thermography. Transportation research record, 1215, 124–131.

Stryk, J. (2008). Road diagnostics – ground penetrating radar possibilities. Intersections Journal, 5(1), 9.

Wong, K.T., Urbaez, E. (2012). Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) – a Tool for Pavement Evaluation and Design. Shaping the future: Linking policy, research and outcomes: 25th ARRB Conference. Perth, Australia: Proceedings, 1–13.

Shengli, L., Chaoqun, W., Panxu, S., Guangming, W., Dongwei, W. (2016). A localization method for concealed cracks in the road base based on ground penetrating radar. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 8(12), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1687814016683154

Miskiewicz, M., Lachowicz, J., Tysiac, P., Jaskula. P., Wilde, K.. (2018). The application of non-destructive methods in the diagnostics of the approach pavement at the bridges. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 356(1), 012023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/356/1/012023

Mardeni, R., Raja, Abdullah R., Shafri, H.Z.M. (2010). Road pavement density analysis using a new non-destructive ground penetrating radar system. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 21, 399–417. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIERB10032202

Saarenketo, T. (2006). Electrical properties of road materials and subgrade soils and the use of Ground Penetrating Radar in traffic infrastructure surveys. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science. Department of Geosciences.

Noor, Ahmad. (2016). Crack detection in asphalt pavements by means of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). Institut für Straßenwesen Braunschweig.

Levatti, H., Prat, P., Ledesma, A., Cuadrado, A., Cordero, J. (2017). Experimental analysis of 3D cracking in drying soils using ground-penetrating radar. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2, 221–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160066

Uus, A., Liatsis, P., Slabaugh, G.G., Anagnostis, A., Roberts, S., Twist, S. (2016). Trend Deviation Analysis for Automated Detection of Defects in GPR Data for Road Condition Surveys. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Systems, Signals and Image Processing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IWSSIP.2016.7502765

Solla, M., Nunez-Nieto, X., Varela-Gonzalez, M., MartInez-Sanchez, J., Arias, P. (2014). GPR for Road inspection : georeferencing and efficient approach to data processing and visualization. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar – GPR, Brussels, Belgium, 913–918. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970559

Miskiewicz, M., Lachowicz, J., Tysiac, P., Jaskula, P., Wilde, K. (2018). The application of non-destructive methods in the diagnostics of the approach pavement. Proceedings of the bridges IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/356/1/012023

Dera, Abdallah Alhadi. (2016). Assessment of highway condition using combined geophysical surveys. Doctoral Dissertations. Faculty of the Graduate School of the Missouri university of science and technology. In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree doctor of philosophy in geological engineering.

Francisco, F., Jorge, P., Mercedes, S., Mattia, F., Andrea, B., Luca, C. (2018). GPR dipoles orientation in road pavement cracking identification. 20th EGU General Assembly. Proceedings from the conference held. Vienna, Austria.

Guo, Shi-li, Yan, Fei, Zhu, Pei-min, Li, Xiu-zhong. (2016). Numerical study on response of ground penetrating radar wave field to crack width. Progress in Geophysics, 31, 04, 1803–1808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6038/pg20160451

Francisco M., Fernandes, Jorge C., Pais. (2017). Laboratory observation of cracks in road pavements with GPR Construction and Building Materials, 154, 1130–1138. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.022

Published

2022-06-24

How to Cite

Batrakova А., Urdzik С., & Batrakov Д. (2022). ANALYSIS OF MODERN METHODS AND TOOLS FOR DIAGNOSTICS OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT. Municipal Economy of Cities, 3(170), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2022-3-170-134-142

Most read articles by the same author(s)