ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF SPATIAL PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF LAND USE IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Authors

  • V. Frolov O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-3-177-92-97

Keywords:

spatial support, environmental monitoring, geoinformation system, land plot, land management, cadastral data, land use, information support, automation

Abstract

The study analyzed international approaches to environmental monitoring of urban land use. Systematic studies of the problem and scientific views are revealed.

Based on the results of the research, the importance of spatial support for environmental monitoring is summarized. Specific examples show the role of geospatial data application in the process of monitoring urban environmental problems.

Environmental monitoring of urban land use is an important tool for ensuring sustainable development of cities. Although there are many technologies and methods for monitoring, researchers focus on issues of efficiency, usability, technology dependency, and data quality. It is important to ensure the availability of data and the human capacity to carry out monitoring to ensure successful results and improve the management of urban development.

However, it is important to take into account the peculiarities of each specific area and its environmental problems, as well as understand the needs and expectations of local residents. Therefore, before the implementation of the monitoring system, it is necessary to conduct a thorough analysis of needs and opportunities, involve interested parties and develop an appropriate interaction strategy.

International experience demonstrates that land use monitoring systems are an important tool for ensuring environmental sustainability and development of urban areas. They allow identifying and solving environmental problems, preserving, and efficiently using natural resources, as well as ensuring sustainable development of cities and improving the quality of life of local residents.

The researched issues in the article reveal various global practices and provide an opportunity to comprehensively assess the importance of creating a qualitative spatial basis for environmental monitoring of land use in the urban environment.

The issue of spatial provision of ecological monitoring of the use of land in the urban environment is quite complex and relevant in international practice, which requires a clear understanding of the system of factors of environmental impact on the land of the urban environment and requires the creation of a monitoring system for ecological processes that take place in cities and have a significant impact on their ecosystems.

Author Biography

V. Frolov, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

assistant at the Department of Land Administration and Geoinformation Systems

References

Petrakovska O., Lizunova A. (2009). Urban planning in private property conditions in Ukraine. International Academic Group On Planning, Law And Property Rights. Third Conference. Aalborg, Denmark, 11-13.

Larsson, G. (1991). Land registration and Cadastral Systems: tools for land information and management. Esex: Longman Scientific and Technical, 387.

Pieri, C., Dumanski, J., Hamblin, A., Young, A. (1996). Land Quality Indicators. World Bank Discussion Papers. Washington: The World Bank, 315, 51. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-3511-1

Nesterenko, S., Mishchenko, R., Shchepak, V., Shariy, G. (2020). Public Cadastral Maps as a Basis for a Construction of the Building General Layout. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Building Innovations. ICBI 2019. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 73. Springer, Cham, 161-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42939-3_18

Tregub M., Trehub Y. (2015) Substantiation of land management methods of industrial cities Theoretical and Practical Solutions of Mineral Resource Mining. Taylor & Francis Group, London. P. 449-452.

El-Rabbany, A.E-S. (1994). The effect of physical correlations on the ambiguity resolution and accuracy estimation in GPS differential positioning. Dept. of Geodesy &Geomatic Eng., University of New Brunswick, Canada, Tech. rept. No 170, 161. Retrieved from: https://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/islandora/object/unbscholar%3A8565

Brown, A. (1989). Extended differential GPS. Navigation, 36 (3), 265–285. Retrieved from: https://www.ion.org/publications/abstract.cfm?articleID=100290

Beutler, G., Bauersima, I., Botton, S., et al. (1989).Accuracy and biases in the geodetic application of the Global Positioning System. Manuscripta geodaetica, 14, 28–35. Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Accuracy-and-biasesin-the-geodetic-application-of-BeutlerBauersima/7eba2eed406041dbd75afd419455067e69de7bb

Rizos, C. (1999). Principles and Practice of GPS Surveying. Retrieved from: http://www.gmat.unsw.edu.au/snap/gps/gps_survey/

Teunissen, P.J.G., Bock, Y., Beutler, G., et al. (1998). GPS for geodesy. Berlin, Springer. Retrieved from: https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/

Published

2023-05-26

How to Cite

Frolov, V. (2023). ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF SPATIAL PROVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF LAND USE IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT. Municipal Economy of Cities, 3(177), 92–97. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-3-177-92-97

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>